Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

The efficiency of transvenous access for embolization of convexital cerebral arteriovenous malformations

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2018-3.1.10

Abstract

Introduction. Convexital localization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) is a good prognostic criterion for successful endovascular treatment. Difficulties begin in the final stages of large AVMs, in the transit nature of afferents. Transvenous embolization has been developed as an alternative to microsurgery and radiosurgery for a limited range of malformations. Materials, methods, results. January 2011 - December 2016, the National Medical Research Center treated 440 patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations who underwent more than 1200 embolization sessions. From this number, a transvenous access to the AVM was performed in 43 patients. AVMs were localized in the cerebral cortex of 12 patients; in 2 of them (17 %) the transvenous embolization was the single treatment option; the rest of the patients required 2 to 4 preliminary transarterial staged embolizations. In the group, no lethal outcomes and significant persistent neurological deficit were recorded. Total deactivation was achieved in 9 patients (75 %); 2 patients (16.7 %) required microsurgical removal of residual AVM network; in 1 patient (8.3 %), radiosurgical treatment was performed. Discussion. Comparing the results of transvenous treatment of convexital malformations with an of patients treated with the classic transarterial technique, no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in morbidity and mortality was achieved. The total occlusion rate of transvenous embolization is significantly higher (p < 0.05). Conclusions. A gradual expansion of indications for the transvenous access increases the efficiency of surgical treatment of this pathology without significantly increasing the risks of adverse outcomes. This access should only be used in centers with significant experience of transarterial embolization.

About the Authors

K. Y. Orlov
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


V. V. Berestov
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


A. L. Krivoshapkin
Novosibirsk State Medical University; European Medical Center
Russian Federation


N. V. Strelnikov
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


M. V. Demyanovskaya
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


D. S. Kislitsyn
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


A. V. Gorbatykh
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


P. O. Seleznev
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


T. S. Shayakhmetov
Academician E.N. Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
Russian Federation


References

1. Маряшев С.А., Голанов А.В., Коновалов А.Н., Яковлев С.Б., Ильялов С.Р., Элиава Ш.Ш., Пронин И.Н., Костюченко В.В., Яхина М.В., Горлачев Г.Е.. Радиохирургическое облучение пациентов с артериовенозными мальформациями головного мозга на аппарате Гамма-нож // Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. - 2013. - Т. 77, № 5. - С. 16-29

2. Орлов К.Ю., Берестов В.В., Кривошапкин А.Л., Панарин В.А., Горбатых А.В., Шаяхметов Т.С., Кислицин Д.С., Селезнев П.О., Стрельников Н.В. Трансартериальная и трансвенозная эмболизация двухузловой глубокой артерио-венозной мальформации головного мозга // Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. - 2015. - Т. 79, № 3. - С. 85-89

3. Васяткина А.Г., Левин Е.А., Кобозев В.В., Орлов К.Ю. Опыт применения нейрофизиологического мониторинга при нейрохирургических операциях // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. -2016. - Т. 20, № 3. - С. 108-117

4. Панарин В.А., Орлов К.Ю., Кривошапкин А.Л., Чупахин А.П., Черевко А.А., Хе А.К., Телегина Н.Ю., Баранов В.И. Использование гидродинамических расчётов в выборе сценария эмболизации церебральной артериовенозной мальформации c фистульным компонентом // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. - 2012. - № 4. - С. 39-44

5. Элиава Ш.Ш., Филатов Ю.М., Пилипенко Ю.В., Шехтман О.Д., Белоусова О.Б., Окишев Д.Н., Хейреддин А.С., Яковлев С.Б., Цейтлин А.М., Кафтанов А.Н., Маряшев С.А., Непомнящий В.П. Микрохирургическое лечение артериовенозных мальформаций головного мозга в НИИ нейрохирургии им. Н.Н. Бурденко (опыт последних лет) // Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. - 2012. - T. 76, № 3. - С. 34-44

6. Brown R.D. (2008). Unruptured brain AVMs: to treat or not to treat. Lancet Neurol, 7, 195.

7. Crawford P.M. (1986). Cerebral arteriovenous malformations and epilepsy: factors in the development of epilepsy. Epilepsia, 27 (3), 270-275.

8. Choudhri O., Ivan M.E., Lawton M.T. (2015). Trans-venous approach to intracranial arteriovenous malformations: challenging the axioms of arteriovenous malformation therapy? Neurosurgery, 77 (4), 644-651.

9. Kessler I, Riva R, Ruggiero M, Manisor M, Al-Khawaldeh M, Mounayer C. (2011). Successful transvenous embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations using Onyx in five consecutive patients. Neurosurgery, 69 (1), 184-193. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bb34.

10. Mast H., Mohr J.P., Osipov A., Pile-Spellman J., Marshall R.S., Lazar R.M., Stein B.M., Young W.L. (1995). Steal is an unestablished mechanism for the clinical presentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke, 26, 1215-1220.

11. Nguyen T.N., Chin L.S., Souza R., Norbash A.M. (2010). Transvenous embolization of a ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformation with en-passage arterial supply: initial case report. J Neurointerv Surg, 2 (2), 150-152.

12. Ogilvy C.S., Stieg P.E., Awad I., Brown R.D. Jr, Kondziolka D., Rosenwasser R., Young W.L., Hademenos G.; Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association. (2001). AHA Scientific Statement: Recommendations for the management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association. Stroke, 32 (6), 1458-1471.

13. Orlov K., Gorbatykh A., Berestov V., Shayakhmetov T., Kislitsin D., Seleznev P., Strelnikov N. (2017). Superselective transvenous embolization with Onyx and n-BCA for vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations with restricted transarterial access: safety, efficacy, and technical aspects. Childs Nerv Syst, 33 (11), 2003-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3499-6.

14. Pereira V.M., Marcos-Gonzalez A., Radovanovic I., Bijlenga P., Narata A.P., Moret J., Schaller K., Lovblad K.O. (2013). Transvenous embolization of a ruptured deep cerebral arteriovenous malformation. A technical note. Interv Neuroradiol, 19 (1), 27-34.

15. Valavanis A. (1996). The role of angiography in the evaluation of cerebral vascular malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 6 (3), 679-704.


Review

For citations:


Orlov K.Y., Berestov V.V., Krivoshapkin A.L., Strelnikov N.V., Demyanovskaya M.V., Kislitsyn D.S., Gorbatykh A.V., Seleznev P.O., Shayakhmetov T.S. The efficiency of transvenous access for embolization of convexital cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2018;3(1):66-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2018-3.1.10

Views: 721


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)