Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

RARE CLINICAL CASE: FORMATION OF ARTIFICIAL URETHER AFTER AMPUTATION OF THE PENIS

https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a0a89d6e39422.45677050

Abstract

A brief overview of the problem of the penis amputation, the consequences and possible methods for their resolution is presented. The article describes epidemiological situation and the main causes of the penis amputation. The modern existing ways of surgical treatment are illuminated, depending on the cause of amputation. Variants of phalloplasty are described. A rare clinical case of a patient undergoing amputation of the penis and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for penile cancer in the third stage is presented. Subsequently, the patient underwent obliteration of the urethraperineostomy, as a result of which a cystostomy was performed. The patient complained of the impossibility of independent urination, a decrease in the quality of life. The presence of the crotch stoma did not suit the patient, he asked to restore the ability to upstanding urination. To eliminate these problems, fulfill the requirements, we reconstructed the patient's preserved and the formed the artificial part of the urethra. In the postoperative period, a complication occurred - urethral fistulas, which required a repeated corrective operation. Described are remote, yearly and biennial results with the presentation of objective methods of control - urethrograms and uroflowmetry. Conclusions are given on the presented material, it was suggested to use this technique in certain groups of patients, to re-evaluate after accumulating a significant experience of such interventions.

About the Authors

V. A. Vorobyev
ОГАУЗ «Иркутская городская клиническая больница № 1»
Russian Federation


V. A. Beloborodov
ФГБОУ ВО «Иркутский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России; ОГАУЗ «Иркутская городская клиническая больница № 1»
Russian Federation


References

1. Злокачественные заболевания России в 2014 году (заболеваемость и смертность) [Электронный ресурс] / Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. - М., 2016. - Режим доступа: http://www.oncology.ru/service/statistics/malignant_tumors. Kaprin AD, Starinskiy VV, Petrova GV. (eds.). (2016). Malignant diseases in Russia in 2014 (morbidity and mortality) [Zlokachestvennye zabolevaniya Rossii v 2014 godu (zabolevaemost' ismertnost']]. Available at: http:// www.oncology.ru/service/statistics/malignant_tumors.

2. Караваев В.П., Проэдш А.А., Копыль М.А. Опыт лечения олеогранулем полового члена // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. - 2000. - № 1. - С. 79. Karavaev VP, Proedsh AA, Kopyl MA. (2000). Experience of the treatment of penile oleoma [Opyt lecheniya oleogranulem polovogo chlena]. Andrologiya i genital'naya khirurgiya, (1), 79.

3. Курбатов Д.Г. Буккальная уретропластика. - М.: Медпрактика, 2009. - 98 с. Kurbatov DG. (2009). Buccal urethroplasty [Bukkal'naya uretroplastika]. Moskva, 98 p.

4. Лоран О.Б., Велиев Е.И., Котов СВ., Беломытцев СВ. Выбор оптимального свободного лоскута для заместительной уретропластики при протяженных стриктурах уретры // Урология. - 2011. - № 4. -С. 11-16. Loran OB, Veliyev EI, Kotov SV, Belomyttsev ST. (2011). Choosing the most optimal free graft for substitution urethroplasty at extended urethral strictures [Vybor optimal’nogo svobodnogo loskuta dlya zamestitel’noy uretroplastiki pri protyazhennykh strikturakh uretry]. Urologiya, (4), 11-16.

5. Лоран О.Б., Щеплев П.А., Сокольщик М.М., Нестеров С.Н., Гагарина С.В. Хирургическое лечение ампутаций полового члена // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. - 2001. - № 1. - С. 46-52. Loran OB, Shcheplev PA, Sokolshchik MM, Nesterov SN, Gagarin SV. (2001). Surgical treatment of penile amputation [Khirurgicheskoe lechenie amputatsiy polovogo chlena]. Andrologiya igenital'naya khirurgiya, (1), 46-52.

6. Миланов Н.О., Адамян Р.Т., Сидоренков Д.А., Старцева О.И. Восстановительная и реконструктивная микрохирургия в урологии // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. - 2000. - № 1. - С. 72-73. Milanov NO, Adamyan RT, Sidorenkov DA. Startseva OI. (2000). Restorative and reconstructive microsurgery in urology [Vosstanovitel’naya i rekonstruktivnaya mikrok-hirurgiya v urologii]. Andrologiya i genital'naya khirurgiya, (1), 72-73.

7. Babaei A.R., Safarinejad M.R. (2007). Penile replantation, science or myth? A systematic review. Urol J, 4 (2), 62-65.

8. Beniamin F., Castagnetti M., Rigamonti W. (2008). Surgical management of penile amputation in children. J Pediatr Surg, 43 (10), 1939-1943. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.05.028.

9. Chaux A., Netto G.J., Rodriguez I.M., Barreto J.E., Oertell J., Ocampos S., Boggino H., Codas R., Xavier Bosch F., de Sanjose S., Munoz N., Hildesheim A., Cubilla A.L. (2013). Epidemiologic profile, sexual history, pathologic features, and human papillomavirus status of 103 patients with penile carcinoma. World J Urol, 31 (4), 861-867. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0802-0.

10. Cancer incidence in five continents. Volume VIII. (2002). IARC Sci Publ, (155), 1-781.

11. D’Ancona C.A., Botega N.J., De Moraes C., Lavoura N.S. Jr, Santos J.K., Rodrigues Netto N. Jr. (1997). Quality of life after partial penectomy for penile carcinoma. Urology, 50 (4), 593-596.

12. Djordjevic M.L., Palminteri E., Martins F. (2014). Male genital reconstruction for the penile cancer survivor. Curr Opin Urol, 24 (4), 427-433. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000068.

13. Garaffa G., Raheem A.A., Christopher N.A., Ralph D.J. (2009). Total phallic reconstruction after penile amputation for carcinoma. BJU Int, 104 (6), 852-856. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08424.x.

14. Gerullis H., Georgas E., Bagner J.W., Eimer C., Otto T. (2013). Construction of a penoid after penectomy using a transpositioned testicle. Urol Int, 90 (2), 240-242. doi: 10.1159/000341555.

15. Hage J.J. (2009). Simple, safe, and satisfactory secondary penile enhancement after near-total oncologic amputation. Ann Plast Surg, 62 (6), 685-689. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181835ae1.

16. Horenblas S., van Tinteren H., Delemarre J.F., Boon T.A., Moonen L.M., Lustig V. (1992). Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. II. Treatment of the primary tumor. J Urol, 147 (6), 1533-1538.

17. Opjordsmoen S., Fossâ S.D. (1994). Quality of life in patients treated for penile cancer. A follow-up study. Br J Urol, 74 (5), 652-657.

18. Ornellas A.A., Kinchin E.W., Nôbrega B.L., Wisnescky A., Koifman N., Quirino R. (2008) Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Brazilian National Cancer Institute long-term experience. J Surg Oncol, 97 (6), 487-495. doi: 10.1002/jso.20980.

19. Lumen N., Houtmeyers P., Monstrey S., Spinoit A.F., Oosterlinck W., Hoebeke P. (2014). Revision of perineal urethrostomy using a meshed split-thickness skin graft. Case Rep Nephrol Urol, 4 (1), 12-17. doi: 10.1159/000358556.

20. Monga M., Broderick G.A., Hellstrom W.J. (1996). Priapism in sickle cell disease: the case for early implantation of the penile prosthesis. Eur Urol, 30 (1), 54-59.

21. Narayana A.S., Olney L.E., Loening S.A., Weimar G.W., Culp D.A. (1982). Carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 219 cases. Cancer, 49 (10), 2185-2191.

22. Philippou P., Shabbir M., Malone P., Nigam R., Muneer A., Ralph D.J., Minhas S. (2012). Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control. J Urol, 188 (3), 803-808. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.012.

23. Schover L.R. (2005). Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 523527. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2005.1.523.

24. Smith Y., Hadway P., Biedrzycki O., Perry M.J., Corbishley C., Watkin N.A. (2007). Reconstructive surgery for invasive squamous carcinoma of the glans penis. Eur Urol, 52 (4), 1179-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.038.

25. Zinman L.M., Libertino J.A., Roth R.A. (1978). Management of operative ureteral injury. Urology, 12 (3), 290-303.


Review

For citations:


Vorobyev V.A., Beloborodov V.A. RARE CLINICAL CASE: FORMATION OF ARTIFICIAL URETHER AFTER AMPUTATION OF THE PENIS. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2017;2(6):104-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a0a89d6e39422.45677050

Views: 1320


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)