Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

FEATURES OF VISUAL PERCEPTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRESBYOPIA, DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF INTRAOCULAR CORRECTION

https://doi.org/10.12737/23795

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the long-term results of presbyopia correction in patients with primary cataract depending on type of implantable lOLs. Material and methods. A profound study of visual functions and assessment of visual quality of 90 patients (mean age 63.3 ± 1.2 years) with partial cataracts and presbyopia. The studies were conducted before surgery and in late postoperative period after bilateral cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of different models IOLs that provide a high visual acuity in distance and at close range. Results. Bilateral implantation of monofocal lOLs for monovision principle leads to a significant increase in far visual acuity of leading the eye and near visual acuity of slave eye. However, patients need long-term adaptation to artificial anisometropia. As a result of bilateral implantation of accommodating lOLs a significant improvement in visual acuity at distance and near occurs. Surgical treatment provides best visual quality of patients up to 6 months after surgery. ln period from 12 to 24 months after surgery, there was a decrease of visual functions as a result of fibrosis of capsular bag. The correction of presbyopia by creating a multifocal optical system as a result of bilateral multifocal refractive IOL implantation leads to a stable improvement of visual acuity at far and close distance. But thus the contrast sensitivity deteriorates, especially in low- and high-frequency ranges. Conclusion. lntraocular correction of presbyopia is a highly effective method of treatment, allowing obtaining high visual acuity in distance and at close range. However, the results depend on chosen strategy of intraocular correction

About the Authors

A. G. Shchuko
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ; ГБОУ ДПО «Иркутская государственная медицинская академия последипломного образования» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


O. P. Mishchenko
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ
Russian Federation


T. N. Iureva
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ; ФГБОУ ВО «Иркутский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


N. Y. Senchenko
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ
Russian Federation


O. I. Rozanova
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ
Russian Federation


References

1. Балашевич Л.И. Хирургическая коррекция аномалий рефракции и аккомодации. - СПб.: СПбМАПО; 2009. - 200 с. Balashevich LI (2009). Surgical correction of anomalies of refraction and accommodation [Khirurgicheskaya korrektsiya anomaliy refraktsii i akkomodatsii], 200.

2. Вит В.В. Строение зрительной системы человека. - Одесса: Астропринт, 2003. - 664 c. Vit VV (2003). The structure of the human visual system [Stroenie zritel’noy sistemy cheloveka], 664.

3. Пресбиопия / Под ред. О.И. Розановой, А.Г. Щуко. - М.: Офтальмология, 2015. - 154 c. Rozanova OI, Shchuko AG (eds.) (2015). Presbyopia [Presbiopiya], 154.

4. Розанова О.И., Мищенко О.П., Щуко А.Г. Результаты имплантации мультифокальных рефракционных интраокулярных линз у пациентов с пресбиопией и катарактой // Практическая медицина. - 2012. -№ 4-1 (59). - С. 295-298. Rozanova OI, Mishchenko OP, Shchuko AG (2012). Results of implantation of multifocal refraction intraocular lenses in patients with presbiopiya and cataract [Rezul’taty implantatsii mul’tifokal’nykh refraktsionnykh intraokulyarnykh linz u patsientov s presbiopiey i kataraktoy]. Prakticheskaya meditsina, 4-1 (59), 295-298.

5. Bassam A, Donnenfeld E (2011). Bonus feature: IOL Explantation: indications and strategies for multifocal IOL explantation. Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today, (4), 18-20.

6. Charman WN (2014). Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 34 (1), 8-29.

7. Datiles 3rd MB, Ansari RR, Suh KI (2008). Clinical detection of precataractous lens protein changes using dynamic light scattering. Arch. Ophthalmol., 126 (12), 1687-1693.

8. Fernandez-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Munoz-Negrete FJ (2012). Causes of IOL explantation in Spain. Eur. J. Ophthalmol, 22 (5), 762-768.

9. Goertz AD, Stewart WC, Burns WR, Stewart JA, Nelson LA (2014). Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world. Acta Ophthalmol., 92 (6), 497-500.

10. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM (2008). Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch. Ophthalmol., 126 (12), 1731-1739.

11. Nijkamp MD, Dolders MG, de Brabander J (2004). Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology, 111 (10), 1832-1839.

12. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2010). Global estimates of visual impairment. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 96 (5), 614-618.

13. Schneider J, Leeder SR, Gopinath B, Wang JJ, Mitchell P (2010). Frequency, course, and impact of correctable visual impairment (uncorrected refractive error). Survey of Ophthalmology, 55 (6), 539-560.


Review

For citations:


Shchuko A.G., Mishchenko O.P., Iureva T.N., Senchenko N.Y., Rozanova O.I. FEATURES OF VISUAL PERCEPTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRESBYOPIA, DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF INTRAOCULAR CORRECTION. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2016;1(6):137-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/23795

Views: 806


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)