Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Analysis of Optical Properties of Posterior Surface of Cornea in Patients after Anterior Radial Keratotomy

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.4.3

Abstract

Taking into account the constant increase in patients with age-related cataracts after radial keratotomy, a careful analysis of both the optical and anatomical properties of the cornea with the examination of the posterior surface is of particular importance.

Aim. To analyze the optical properties of the posterior surface of the cornea in patients after anterior radial keratotomy. 

Materials and methods. An examination of 24 patients (48 eyes) with age-related cataracts of varying degrees of density, myopia and the presence of a previous anterior radial keratotomy or radial-tangential keratotomy in history. The average age of patients was 59.5 years (from 47 to 68), there were 19 women and 5 men.

Results. The radius of curvature of the anterior surface in patients after anterior radial keratotomy was 9.45 ± 0.91 mm on average along the meridians, which is significantly more in comparison with these indices in control patients – 7.70 ± 0.19 mm (p = 0.0001). The ratio of the radii of the posterior cornea curvature to the anterior radius on average along the meridians in patients after anterior radial keratotomy was 1.07 ± 0.70, and in control patients – 1.20 ± 0.02 (p = 0.0001). The keratometric index in patients after anterior radial keratotomy was 1.3538 ± 0.0239, and in the control group – 1.3372 ± 0.0003 (p = 0.23).

Conclusion. In patients after anterior radial keratotomy, keratometry of the posterior surface of the cornea is significantly higher than in the control. The ratio of the radius of curvature of the posterior cornea to the radius of curvature of the anterior cornea varies significantly after anterior radial keratotomy, which is due to a more pronounced flattening of the posterior cornea. The standard keratometric index (1.3375) is invalid for patients after anterior radial keratotomy and must be calculated individually for each patient when deciding on the operative treatment of cataracts.

About the Authors

E. K. Tsyrenzhapova
Irkutsk Branch of S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Ekaterina K. Tsyrenzhapova – Ophthalmologist

337 Lermontov str., 664033 Irkutsk



O. I. Rozanova
Irkutsk Branch of S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Olga I. Rozanova – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Ophthalmologist, Head of Diagnostic and Treatment Department

337 Lermontov str., 664033 Irkutsk



N. N. Seliverstova
Irkutsk Branch of S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Natalya N. Seliverstova – Cand. Sc. (Med.), Ophthalmologist

337 Lermontov str., 664033 Irkutsk



References

1. Avetisov SE, Mamikonyan VR. Keratorefractive surgery. M.: Poligran; 1993. (In Russ.)

2. Balashevich LI. Surgeries changing the curvature of the central part of the cornea due to interventions on its periphery. In: Balashevich LI. Surgical correction of refraction and accommodation anomalies. Moscow: Chelovek; 2009. p. 17-42. (In Russ)

3. Sawelson H, Marks RG. Five-year results of radial keratotomy. Refractive Corneal Surgery. 1989; 5(1): 8-20.

4. Bikbulatova AA, Pasikova NV. Features of cataract phacoemulsification in patients after anterior radial keratotomy. Sovremennyye tekhnologii kataraktalnoy i refraktsionnoy khirurgii. 2015; (4): 23-26. (In Russ.)

5. Avetisov SE, Antonov AA, Vostrukhin SV. Progressive hyperopic shift after radial keratotomy: possible causes. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2015; (2): 13-18. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2015131213-18. (In Russ.)

6. Balashevich LI, Kachanov AB. Clinical corneotopography and aberrometry. Moscow: FGU “MNTK “Mikrokhirurgiya glaza”, 2008. (In Russ.)

7. Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1998; 14(4): 397-407. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-19980701-05

8. Bikbulatova AA, Pasikova NV. Iatrogenic keratectasia as a long-term complication of anterior keratotomy. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015; (12): 38-41. (In Russ.)

9. Kurenkov VN, Kasyanova EYu. Modern possibilities of studying the topography of the posterior surface of the cornea using the Pentacam three-dimensional topographic scanner. Identify the correlation of the total refractive power of the cornea with the refractive power of its back surface.Ophthalmology in Russia. 2005; 2(3): 17-23. (In Russ.).

10. Holladay JT. Cataract surgery in patients with previous keratorefractive surgery (RK, PRK, and LASIK) Ophthalmic Practice. 1997; 15: 238-244.

11. Langenbucher A, Haigis W, Seitz B. Difficult lens power calculations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15(1): 1-9.

12. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16(3): 349-361.

13. Hamilton DR, Hardten DR. Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003; 14(1): 44-53.

14. Jarade EF, Tabbara KF. Intraocular lens calculations after corneal refractive surgery. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2002; 10(1): 106-111.

15. Awwad ST, Dwarakanathan S, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Verity SM, Mootha VV, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation after radial keratotomy: estimating the refractive corneal power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(6): 1045-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.018

16. Hoffer KJ. Special circumstances: post-laser refractive surgery eyes. In: Hoffer KJ (ed.) IOL Power. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc.; 2011. p. 179-194.

17. Hoffer KJ. Calculation of intraocular lens power in post radial keratotomy eyes. Ophthalmic Practic (Canada). 1994; 12: 242-243.

18. Koch DD, Liu JF, Hyde LL, Rock RL, Emery JM. Refractive complications of cataract surgery after radial keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989; 108(6): 676-682. doi: 10.1016/00029394(89)90860-X

19. Bogush IV. Combined method for determining the optical power of intraocular lenses after radial keratotomy. The Siberian Scientific Medical Journal. 2009; 138(4): 93-99. (In Russ.).

20. Holladay JT, Hill WE, Steinmueller A. Corneal power measurements using Scheimpfl imaging in eyes with prior corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(10): 862-868. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090917-07

21. Senchenko NYa, Rozanova OI, Shanturova MA, Mishchenko OP, Iureva TN. Optimization of the calculation of the optical power of toric IOL in patients with cataracts and altered corneal topography. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2016; (1): 6-13. doi: 10.25276/0235-4160-2016-1-6-13. (In Russ.)

22. Khodzhaev NS, Bogush IV. Methods for the elimination of refractive errors in the calculation of intraocular lenses after kerato-refractive operations. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2010; (2): 51-54. (In Russ.)

23. Panteleev EN, Bessarabov AN, Agafonov SG, Haludorova NB. The possibility of using standard methods for assessing the refractive power of the cornea for calculating the optical power of the IOL after anterior metered radial keratotomy. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011; (14): 295-297. (In Russ.)

24. Panteleev EN, Bessarabov AN, Agafonov SG. The role of changes in anatomical and optical relationships in the anterior segment of the eye after myopic Lasic and dosed radial keratotomy in calculations of the effective position of the IOL. Practical Medicine. 2012; 1(4): 284-287. (In Russ.)

25. NeroevVV,Tarutta EP, Khodzhabekyan NV, Khandzhyan AT, Penkina AV, Milash SV. Using Galilei G2 scheimpflug analyser to determine anatomical and optical parameters of the cornea аfter refractive corneal surgery. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2014; 7(2): 5-9. (In Russ.)

26. Camellin M, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Carbonelli M, Barboni P. Scheimpflug camera measurement of anterior and posterior corneal curvature in eyes with previous radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28(4): 275-279. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120221-03

27. Yousef YuN, Kasyanov AA, Ivanov MN. Calculation of the optical power of intraocular lenses in non-standard clinical situations. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2013; 129(5): 62-66. (In Russ.)

28. Zhezheleva LV, Gusev YuA. The effect of keratometry on the accuracy of the calculation of the optical power of the IOL in patients after radial keratotomy. Kataraktalnaya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2016; 16(1): 25-30. (In Russ.)

29. Dubbelman M, Sicam VA, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea. Vision Res. 2006; 46(6-7): 993-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.021

30. Belin MW. Reading the Pentacam’s maps. Cataract Refractive Surgery.2007; (1): 16-18.

31. Borasio E, Stevens J, Smith GT. Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESS’t formula.JCataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(12): 20042014. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.037

32. Olsen T. On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986; 70: 152-154. doi: 10.1136/bjo.70.2.152


Review

For citations:


Tsyrenzhapova E.K., Rozanova O.I., Seliverstova N.N. Analysis of Optical Properties of Posterior Surface of Cornea in Patients after Anterior Radial Keratotomy. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(4):24-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.4.3

Views: 840


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)