Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Investigation of identity’s peculiarities of the women with PCOS

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2018-3.3.24

Abstract

The aim of the research was studying of identity peculiarities of the women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The authors give a brief review of approaches to the problem in Russian and foreign science. We used the following methods: SEl-test by Soldatova, Life-line by Kronic and Twenty Statements Test by Kuhn&McPartland with the authors' system of processing on the sample of 100 women of reproductive age (50 - with PCOS in accordance with Rotterdam consensus on PCOS and 50 - without PCOS). We have received the following data. The women with PCOS demonstrated a better formed ego-identity (t = 2.32, p < 0.02) and fewer features of identity crisis (t = 2.15, p < 0.03) than their peers from the group of the women without PCOS. They demonstrate more responsibility for their choices and they have better understanding of their emotions and better control over them. Moreover, the women with PCOS have lower tendency to use gender categories (z = 4.32, p < 0.01), family sphere categories (z = 2.7, p < 0.01) and pay more attention to the spheres connected with social identity (carrier, self-development etc.) when self-describing. The data obtained well correlated with the ones obtained earlier, the fact that women with PCOS are more motivated for overcoming stressful situations and the fact that all changes in life, both positive and negative, favor their development.

About the Authors

M. Y. Kuzmin
Irkutsk State University; Scientific Centre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
Russian Federation


L. V. Suturina
Scientific Centre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education - Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation


References

1. Бежина Х.В. Социальная идентичность женщин в ситуации бесплодия // Известия Уральского государственного университета. Серия 1: Проблемы образования, науки и культуры. - 2010. - № 6 (85), Ч. 2. - С. 117-121

2. Колесникова Л.И., Колесников С.И., Даренская М.А., Гребенкина Л.А., Никитина О.А., Лазарева Л.М., Сутурина Л.В., Данусевич И.Н., Дружинина Е.Б., Семендяев А.А. Активность процессов ПОЛуженщин с синдромом поликистозных яичников и бесплодием // Бюл. экспериментальной биологии и медицины. -2016 - Т. 162, № 9. - С. 300-303

3. Кузьмин М.Ю., Гусев А.Н., Конопак И.А. Связь гендерной идентичности и жизнестойкости у студенток, обучающихся в ВУЗе // Вестник Читинского государственного университета. - 2011. - № 1. - С. 58-62

4. Кузьмин М.Ю., Игумнов И.А., Сутурина Л.С. Проблемы совладающего поведения у женщин с синдромом поликистозных яичников // Современные исследования социальных проблем. - 2017. - Т. 8, № 11. - С. 60-75

5. Лидерс А.Г. Психологическое обследование семьи. - М.: Академия, 2008. - 432 с

6. Смирнов Н.В., Земзюлина И.Н. Личностная идентичность женщины в ситуации нарушения репродуктивной функции // Молодёжь в современном мире: Матер. междунар. науч.-практ. конф. студентов и молодых учёных. - Курск, 2015. - С. 176-180

7. Солдатова Е.Л. Динамика эго-идентичности и представлений о будущем в нормативных кризисах взрослости // Психологическая наука и образование. - 2006. - № 2. - С. 16-30

8. Amiri N.F., Tehrani R.F., Simbar M., Mohammadpour Thamtan R.A., Shiva N. (2014). Female gender scheme is disturbed by polycystic ovary syndrome: A qualitative study from Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J., 16 (2), e12423. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.12423

9. Kitzinger C., Willmott J. (2002). 'The thief of womanhood’: women’s experience of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Soc Sci Med, 54 (3), 349-361.

10. Lizneva D., Kirubakaran R., Mykhalchenko K., Suturina L., Chernukha G., Diamond M.P., Azziz R. (2016). Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and metaanalysis. Fertil Steril, 106 (06), 1510-1520. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1121

11. Lizneva D., Suturina L., Walker W., Brakta S., Gavrilova-Jordan L., Azziz R. (2016). Criteria, prevalence, and phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril, 106 (1), 6-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.003

12. Morotti E., Persico N., Battaglia B., Fabbri R., Meriggiola M.C., Venturoli S., Battaglia C. (2013). Body imaging and sexual behavior in lean women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Sex Med, 10 (11), 2752-2760. DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12284.

13. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. (2004). Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril, 81 (1), 19-25.


Review

For citations:


Kuzmin M.Y., Suturina L.V. Investigation of identity’s peculiarities of the women with PCOS. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2018;3(3):155-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2018-3.3.24

Views: 804


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)