Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

The Relationship between Neuropsychological Performance and Level of Direct Current Potential in Patients with Occupational Diseases from Exposure to Physical Factors

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2021-6.1.14

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify the peculiarities of neuropsychological indices disorders depending on changes in the level of constant potential in patients with occupational diseases as a result of physical factors.

Materials and methods. The study involved 60 patients with vibration disease caused by local vibration (group I), 106 patients with vibration disease caused by combined exposure to local and general vibration (group II), 101 civil aviation pilots with an established diagnosis of professional sensorineural hearing loss (group III), and 50 healthy men (group IV, comparison group) who were not exposed to vibration and noise due to the specifics of their professional activities. Methods of neuro-energy mapping and neuropsychological testing were used.

Results. In groups I–II, compared with group IV, an increase in local levels of constant potential (DC-potential level) in the central, right temporal, and central frontal parts of the brain (2.3 (6.5–3.8) mV; –0.3 (–2.1–2.1); 2.1 (–3.4–6.8) and –0.3 (–3.1–4.3); –2.24 (–6.4–3.8); 0.9 (–3.1–8.5) mV at p = 0.005, 0.007 and 0.004 respectively). Differences in the values of DC-potential level gradients in individuals of group III when compared with group IV reached the level of significance in the central, temporal, occipital leads relative to the central frontal (–5.0 (–13.1–3.8); –4.1 (–9.4–5.1); –2.1 (–10.9–6.6); –6.3 (–15.3–1.8) and 2.9 (–3.0–10.6); 2.2 (–4.5–13.8); 5.6 (–7.6–14.1); –1.4 (–7.5–3.9) mV at p = 0.008; 0.009; 0.009, and 0.007 respectively). Cognitive disorders in patients of groups I–III when compared with group IV correspond to a mild disorder of dynamic, constructive praxis and expressive speech (1.40 (0–1,6); 1.43 (0–1,7); 1.2 (0–1,5) and 0.3 (0–1); 0.2 (0–1); 0.06 (0–1) points at p = 0.008, 0.008 and 0.009 respectively).

Conclusions. A common neurofunctional sign of a mild impairment of the cognitive sphere in occupational diseases caused by physical factors is an increase in direct current potential level in the frontal-central and parieto-occipital regions, predominantly of the left hemisphere of the brain.

About the Authors

O. I. Shevchenko
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

Oksana I. Shevchenko – Cand. Sc. (Biol.), Senior Research Officer at the Laboratory of the Professional and Ecologically Caused Pathology

12А Microdistrict 3, Angarsk 665827



O. L. Lakhman
East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research
Russian Federation

Oleg L. Lakhman – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Professor of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

12А Microdistrict 3, Angarsk 665827



References

1. Biryukbayeva GN. Complications of cerebral vascular atherosclerosis in persons of flight professions, posing a threat to flight safety. Approaches to expert assessment of the suitability of a professional. Voennaya meditsina. 2012; (3): 83-88. (In Russ.)

2. Borzunova YuM. Cognitive defi y valuation among patients with vibrational disease, based on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Ural Medical Academic Science. 2009; (3): 48-50. (In Russ.)

3. Borzunova YuM, Fedorov AA. Psychoemotional status and state of cerebral circulation in miners of vibration hazardous professions. Ural Medical Journal. 2012; (10): 66-68. (In Russ.)

4. Ganovitch EA, Semenikhin VA. Dysfunction of cognitive and memory spheres during vibration disease in miners of Kuzbass. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2011; (12): 44-51. (In Russ.)

5. Shevchenko OI, Lakhman OL. Neuropsychological features of patients with occupational diseases from exposure to physical factors. In: Komkov VN, Chervyakova TA. (eds.) International Scientific Conference «Information Society: Health, Economics and Law»: Materials of the International and Practical Conference, Irkutsk, March 13-14, 2019. Irkutsk; 2019: 123-130. doi: 10.34648/SIDPO.2019.56.97.049

6. Katamanova EV, Shevchenko OI, Lakhman OL, Denisova IA. Cognitive disorders in patients with chronic mercury intoxication. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2014; 4: 7-12. (In Russ.)

7. Retnev VM, Shlyakhetsky NS. Organizational and legal issues in determining the damage to public health from the impact of adverse environmental factors. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2005; (3): 60-62. (In Russ.)

8. Yakhno NN, Lokshina AB, Zakharov VV, Grishina DA, Koberskaya NN, Mkhitaryan EA, et al. The syndrome of mild cognitive disorders in the Russian population. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019; 119(5): 179-180. (In Russ.)

9. Borzunova YuM. Physiobalneotherapy of vibration disease associated with discirculatory encephalopathy: Results of clinical, neuropsychological research methods and quality of life. Ural Medical Journal. 2014; (5): 105-109. (In Russ.)

10. Peters JL, Zevitas CD, Redline S, Hastings A, Sizov N, Hart JE, et al. Aviation noise and cardiovascular health in the United States: A review of the evidence and recommendations for research direction. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018: 5(2): 140-152. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0151-2

11. Charney DS, Manji HK. Life stress, genes, and depression: Multiple pathways lead to increased risk and new opportunities for intervention. Sci STKE. 2004; 2004(225): re5. doi: 10.1126/stke.2252004re5

12. Andersen SL. Trajectories of brain development: Point of vulnerability or window of opportunity? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003; 27(1-2): 3-18. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00005-8

13. Dolcos S, MacDonald SWS, Braslavsky A, Camicioli R, Dixon RA. Mild cognitive impairment is associated with selected functional markers: Integrating concurrent, longitudinal, and stability effects. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26(2): 209-223. doi: 10.1037/a0026760

14. Rukavishnikov VS, Pankov VA, Kuleshova MV, Katamanova EV, Kartapoltseva NV, Rusanova DV, et al. On theory of sensory conflict under exposure to physical factors: Main principles and concepts of formation. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2015; (4): 1-6. (In Russ.)

15. Paillard AC, Quarck G, Paolino F, Denise P, Paolino M, Golding JF, et al. Motion sickness susceptibility in healthy subjects and vestibular patients: Effects of gender, age and trait-anxiety. JVestib Res. 2013; 23(4-5): 203-209. doi: 10.3233/VES-130501

16. Zhivolupov SA, Samartsev IN, Syroezhkin FA. Contemporary conception of neuroplasticity (theoretical aspects and practical significance). S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2013; 113(10): 102-108. (In Russ.)

17. Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RG. Synaptic plasticity and memory: An evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000; 23: 649-711. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649

18. Rossini PM, Dal Forno G. Integrated technology for evaluation of brain function and neural plasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004; 15(1): 263-306. doi: 10.1016/s1047-9651(03)00124-4

19. Dzyubenko E, Gottschling C, Faissner A. Neuron-glia interactions in neural plasticity: Contributions of neural extracellular matrix and perineuronal nets. Neural Plasticity. 2016; 2016: 5214961. doi: 10.1155/2016/5214961

20. Sanders AF. Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica. 1983; 53(1): 61-97. doi: 10.1016/00016918(83)90016-1

21. Emmanuel Y, Cochlin LE, Tyler DJ, de Jager CA, Smith AD, Clark K. Human hippocampal energy metabolism is impaired during cognitive activity in a lipid infusion model of insulin resistance. Brain and Behavior. 2013; 3(2): 134-144. doi: 10.1002/brb3.124

22. Sergeant J. The cognitive-energetic model: An empirical approach to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000; 24(1): 7-12. doi: 10.1016/s01497634(99)00060-3

23. Borzunova YuM. Evoked brain potentials in the assessment of sensory and cognitive functions in vibration-hazardous miners. Journal of Ural Medical Academic Science. 2012; (1): 61-62. (In Russ.)

24. Drozdova TV, Laskova II, Fomichova EV. Interhemispheric EEG coherence in patients with occupational sensoneural hearing loss. Modern High Technologies. 2006; (8): 38-40. (In Russ.)

25. Shevchenko OI, Lakhman OL. State of energy brain exchange in patients with professional diseases from influence of physical factors. Human Ecology. 2020; (2): 18-23. doi: 10.33396/1728-0869-2020-2-18-23. (In Russ.)

26. Petrova NN. Psychological peculiarity of individual on occupational sensorineural hearing loss. Russian Otorhinolaryngology. 2010; (3): 125-129. (In Russ.)

27. Tretyakov SV, Khabarova EA, Ermakova MA. Cognitive impairments in occupational diseases in the late post-exposure period in combination with cardiovascular pathology. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2011; (10): 27-32. (In Russ.)

28. Fokin VF, Ponomareva NV, Konovalov RN, Krotenkova MV, Medvedev RB, Lagoda OV, et al. Association of cerebral energy processes features and default mode network in patients with chronic cerebrovascular disease. Nervous diseases. 2019; (2): 12-17. doi: 10.24411/2226-0757-2019-12099. (In Russ.)

29. Fokin VF, Shabalina AA, Ponomareva NV, Medvedev RB, Lagoda OV, Tanashyan MM. Correlation between indicators of energy metabolism and the level of stress hormone cortisol with cognitive characteristics of patients with discirculatory encephalopathy. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2018; 12(4): 47-51. doi: 10.25692/ACEN.2018.4.6. (In Russ.)

30. Safonicheva OG, Syazina NYu, Rakhmanina IN. Complementary technologies for restoration of plasticity and inter-hemispheric connections in the children with disabilities. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki. 2017; (1): 73-78. (In Russ.)

31. Sokolova LP, Knyazeva IV, Sukhareva EA. Mental capacity disorders under stress and their correction. Therapy. 2016; 4(8): 122-126. (In Russ.)

32. Lin KC, Huang YH, Hsieh YW, Wu CY. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constrain-induced therapy for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(4): 336-342. doi: 10.1177/1545968308321773

33. Mironov NP Sokolova LP, Borisov YuV. Neuroenergy mapping. Assessment of the functional state of the brain in cognitive impairment of various etiologies. Vestnik MEDSI. 2010; (8): 32-37. (In Russ.)

34. Shmyrev VI, Vitko NK, Mironov NP, Sokolova LP, Borisova YuV, Fokin VF, et al. Neuroenergy mapping is a highly informative method for assessing the functional state of the brain. Neuroenergetic mapping data for cognitive impairments and decreased mental performance. Moscow: Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration; 2010. (In Russ.)

35. Khomskaya ED. Neuropsychology: 4th edition. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2007. (In Russ.)

36. Shevchenko OI, Rusanova DV, Lakhman OL. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological features in patients with occupational sensorineural hearing loss. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2019; 98(10): 1068-1074. doi: 10.18821/0016-9900-2019-98-101068-1073. (In Russ.)

37. Sokolova LP. Assumed stages of diffuse changes in the brain during the formation of cognitive decline. Advances in current natural sciences. 2011; (10): 44-45. (In Russ.)

38. Fokin VF, Ponomareva NV. Energy physiology of the brain. Moscow: Antidor; 2003. (In Russ.)

39. Jha MK, Morrison BM. Glia-neuron energy metabolism in health and diseases: New insights into the role of nervous system metabolic transporters. Exp Neurol. 2018; 309: 23-31. doi: 10.1016/j. expneurol.2018.07.009

40. Visel TG. Highest level of automatism and its hemispheric organization: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistics aspects. Journal of Asymmetry. 2012; 6(2): 35-52. (In Russ.)

41. Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(6): 434-445. doi: 10.1038/nrn2639


Review

For citations:


Shevchenko O.I., Lakhman O.L. The Relationship between Neuropsychological Performance and Level of Direct Current Potential in Patients with Occupational Diseases from Exposure to Physical Factors. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2021;6(1):94-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2021-6.1.14

Views: 1473


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)