Mini-invasive reconstruction technique of the bulbomembranous urethra

The paper presents the technique of the reconstruction of the bulbar and membranous urethra in the occurrence of strictures and sphincter-stenosis. The method uses an autologous graft and has potential advantages over the bulboprostatic anastomosis. Objective. To develop a method of helping patients with existing urethral anastomoses, with a damaged neck of the bladder and a risk of subsequent incontinence, wishing to maintain the erectile function. Materials and methods. 35 patients underwent 36 reconstructions of the urethra from August 2013 to July 2017, 11 - after previous urethral plastics, 14 - after prostate surgery (4 - after radical prostatectomy), 7 - suffered from a urethral distraction defect. The age of the patients was 58.17 ± 12.2 years. The median follow-up period was 525 (341; 813) days. The average length of urethral strictures was 15 (10; 15) mm. The average diameter of the urethra in the stricture zone was 1.4 ± 0.56 mm. Reconstruction with the use of a buccal mucosa graft is performed intraurethrally through corpus spongiosum using magnifying optics. Results. The overall efficacy of the primary reconstruction in 35 patients was 94.2 %; the repeated reconstruction in two patients was successful. All patients underwent the comprehensive monitoring of the results, the average follow-up period was 654 days, the average relapse-free period was 447 days. All patients preserved continence and erectile function Conclusion. The proposed technique showed a high efficiency in reconstruction of the bulbar and membranous urethra.

bulbar and membranous urethra, urethral stricture, urethral stenosis, bulbo-prostatic anastomosis, buccal mucosal urethroplasty

1. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. (2012). Non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary report. BJU Int, 109 (7), 1090-1094. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10508.x.

2. Corriere JN. (2001). 1-Stage delayed bulboprostatic anastomotic repair of posterior urethral rupture: 60 patients with 1-year followup. J Urol, 165 (2), 404-407.

3. Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, webster GD. (2002). Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol, 167 (5), 2075-2078; discussion 2079.

4. Hafez AT, El-Assmy A, Dawaba MS, Sarhan O, Bazeed M. (2005). Long-term outcome of visual internal urethrotomy for the management of pediatric urethral strictures. J Urol, 173 (2), 595-597.

5. Heyns CF, Steenkamp Jw, De Kock ML, whitaker P. (1998). Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful?J Urol, 160 (2), 356-358.

6. Hudak SJ, Atkinson TH, Morey AF. (2012). Repeat transurethral manipulation of bulbar urethral strictures is associated with increased stricture complexity and prolonged disease duration. J Urol, 187 (5), 1691-1695. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.074.

7. Jordan GH, Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R. (2007). The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction. J Urol, 177 (5), 1799-1802.

8. Jordan GH, wessells H, Secrest C, Squadrito JF Jr., McAninch Jw, Levine L, van der Burght M; United States Study Group. (2013). Effect of a temporary thermo-expandable stent on urethral patency after dilation or internal urethrotomy for recurrent bulbar urethral stricture: results from a 1-year randomized trial. J Urol, 190 (1), 130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.014.

9. Koraitim MM. (2014). Optimising the outcome after anastomotic posterior urethroplasty. Arab J Urol, 13(1), 27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.12.006.

10. Koraitim MM. (2012). Unsuccessful outcomes after posterior urethroplasty: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Urology, 79 (5), 1168-1173. doi:10.1016/j. urology.2011.11.078.

11. Kumar S, Kapoor A, Ganesamoni R, Nanjappa B, Sharma V, Mete UK. (2012). Efficacy of holmium laser urethrotomy in combination with intralesional triamcinolone in the treatment of anterior urethral stricture. Korean J Urol, 53 (9), 614-618. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.9.614.

12. Launonen E, Sairanen J, Ruutu M, Taskinen S. (2014). Role of visual internal urethrotomy in pediatric urethral strictures. J Pediatr Urol, 10 (3), 545-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.11.018.

13. Mouraviev VB, Coburn M, Santucci RA. (2005). The treatment of posterior urethral disruption associated with pelvic fractures: comparative experience of early realignment versus delayed urethroplasty.J Urol, 173 (3), 873-876.

14. Mundy AR. (1989). The treatment of sphincter strictures. Br J Urol, 64 (6), 626-628.

15. Mundy AR. (1996). Urethroplasty for posterior urethral strictures. Br J Urol, 78 (2), 243-247.

16. Mundy AR, Andrich DE. (2011). Urethral trauma. Part II: Types of injury and their management. BJU Int, 108 (5), 630-650. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10340.x.

17. Oosterlinck w, Lumen N, Van Cauwenberghe G. (2007). [Surgical treatment of urethral stenoses: technical aspects]. Ann Urol (Paris), 41 (4), 173-207.

18. Steenkamp Jw, Heyns CF, de Kock ML. (1997). Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol, 157 (1), 98-101.

19. Zehri AA, Ather MH, Afshan Q. (2009). Predictors of recurrence of urethral stricture disease following optical urethrotomy. Int J Surg, 7 (4), 361-364. doi: 10.1016/j. ijsu.2009.05.010.

20. webster GD, Ramon J, Kreder KJ. (1990). Salvage posterior urethroplasty after failed initial repair of pelvic fracture membranous urethral defects. J Urol, 144 (6), 1370-1372.