Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF MULTIFOCAL CORRECTION BY CONTACT LENS IN PATIENTS WITH PRESBYOPIA AND MYOPIA REFRACTION

https://doi.org/10.12737/23788

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multifocal contact lens correction in patients with presbyopia and myopic refractive error. The study involved 45 patients with myopia ranging in age from 43 to 56 years in conditions of habitual monofocal contact lens correction, a month after the selection and wearing multifocal contact lenses. Contact correction was carried out according to standard procedures taking into account the accuracy of contact lens fitting, with carrying out functional tests for the "dry eye" syndrome and evaluation of corneal epithelial thickness (Optovue, USA). The assessment of the following parameters of visual perception was made: far, near and middle distance (monocular and binocular) visual acuity, the spatial contrast sensitivity, stereovision (I & II Lang test), the area of binocular interaction field (binarymeter), the quality of vision (VF-14 test ). The use of multifocal contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia with the initial myopic refraction ensures high functional results at different distances. Patients with a myopic refraction, previously used contact lenses, easy pass to multifocal correction option. The greatest satisfaction by achieved vision noted in those patients who had achieved refraction (-)0.5 diopters. In the selection of contact lenses in older patients the thickness of the corneal epithelium and tear film validity must be taken into account.

About the Authors

N. N. Seliverstova
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ
Russian Federation


E. A. Rogozhnikova
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ
Russian Federation


O. I. Rozanova
Иркутский филиал ФГАУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова» МЗ РФ
Russian Federation


References

1. Аксенова Е.Б., Ретунских Л.Я. Методы коррекции пресбиопии контактными линзами // Современная оптометрия. - М., 2011. - № 6, Т. 6. - С. 39-41. Aksenov EB, Retunskaya LY (2011). Methods of correction of presbyopia contact lenses [Metody korrektsii presbiopii kontaktnymi linzami]. Sovremennaya optometriya, 6 (6), 39-41.

2. Кушнаревич Н.Ю., Тырин А.Б. Контрастная чувствительность пресбиопов при коррекции мультифокальными контактными линзами и монокулярной коррекции при разных условиях освещённости // Современная оптометрия. - 2011. - № 3, Т. 43. - С. 20-25. Kushnarevich NY, Tyrin AB (2011). Contrast sensitivity of presbyopic patients in the correction by multifocal contact lenses and monocular correction under different lighting conditions [Kontrastnaya chuvstvitel'nost' presbiopov pri korrektsii mul’tifokal’nymi kontaktnymi linzami i monokulyarnoy korrektsii pri raznykh usloviyakh osveshchennosti]. Sovremennaya optometriya, 3 (43), 20-25.

3. Лещенко И.А. Практическое руководство по подбору мягких контактных линз. - СПб.: РА «Веко», 2010. - 224 с. Leschenko IA (2010). Practical guidance on the fitting of soft contact lenses [Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po podboru myagkikh kontaktnykh linz], 224.

4. Мищенко Т.С., Новожилова Е.Т., Селиверстова Н.Н., Грищук А.С., Розанова О.И. Карта бинокулярности как метод оценки зрительных функций при рефракционных и аккомодационных нарушениях // Бюл. ВСНЦ СО РАМН. - 2011. - № 3-1. - С. 73-76. Mischenko TS, Novozhilova ET, Seliverstova NN, Grischuk AS, Rozanova OI (2011). Map of binocularity as a method of visual function evaluation in the refractive and accommodative disorders [Karta binokulyarnosti kak metod otsenki zritel’nykh funktsiy pri refraktsionnykh i akkomodatsionnykh narusheniyakh]. Bulleten' Vostocno-Sibirskogo naucnogo centra, (3-1), 73-76.

5. Alonso J, Espallargues M, Andersen TF, Cassard SD, Dunn E, Bernth-Petersen P, Norregaard JC, Black C, Steinberg EP, Anderson GF (1997) International applicability of the VF14. An index of visual function in patients with cataracts. Ophthalmology, 104 (5), 799-807.

6. Benjamin WJ, Borish IM (1991) Presbyopia and the influence of ageing on prescription of contact lenses. J. Am. Optometry Assoc., 62 (10), 743-753.

7. Hudson C (2011) How to succeed with multifocal contact lenses. Optometry Today, 51 (11), 120-127.

8. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA. (2011). An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia. Clin. Exp. Optom., (94), 87-92.

9. Nichols JJ (2012). Annual report Contact Lenses 2011. Contact Lens. Spectrum, (1), 12-16.

10. Toshida H, Takahashi K, Sado K, Kanai A, Murakami A (2008). Bifocal contact lenses history, types, characteristics, and actual state and problems. Clin. Ophthalmol, 12 (4), 869-877.

11. Efron N1, Nichols JJ, Woods CA, Morgan PB (2015). Trends in US Contact Lens Prescribing 2002 to 2014. Optom. Vis. Sci., 92 (7), 758-767.

12. Kang P, Wildsoet CF (2016). Acute and short-term changes in visual function with multifocal soft contact lens wear in young adults. Cont. Lens. Anterior Eye, 39 (2), 133-140.


Review

For citations:


Seliverstova N.N., Rogozhnikova E.A., Rozanova O.I. EVALUATION OF CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF MULTIFOCAL CORRECTION BY CONTACT LENS IN PATIENTS WITH PRESBYOPIA AND MYOPIA REFRACTION. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2016;1(6):103-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/23788

Views: 572


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)