Adhesive Process of the Abdominal Cavity as a Risk Factor for the Development of Postoperative Intestinal Fistula
https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.6.20
Abstract
Adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity remains one of the unresolved problems of abdominal surgery. The clinical picture of the pathological process is diverse, treatment of patients is not always effective, and decision-making on the use of certain medical methods is often difficult.
The aim of the research was to assess the severity of the adhesive process and the likelihood of complications in patients with adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity.
Materials and methods. We performed the retrospective analysis of 160 case histories of patients for the period 2006-2010, who, according to emergency indications, were admitted to the surgical department of the Irkutsk Regional Clinical Hospital with a clinic of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction against the background of adhesive disease. To assess the severity of the adhesive process, our own scale for assessing the adhesive process of the abdominal cavity was developed and tested in clinical conditions. To assess the likelihood of developing postoperative unformed intestinal fistulas, a prospective analysis of the treatment of 36 patients with acute adhesive intestinal obstruction was performed.
Results. The severity of the adhesive process in the operated patients was 13 (10-15) points, which indicates a pronounced adhesive process. In patients operated repeatedly for commissural intestinal obstruction, the severity of the adhesion process according to the proposed scale was 14 (14-15) points, which corresponds to pronounced adhesion of the abdominal organs. Based on the proposed scale, the probability of developing postoperative unformed intestinal fistulas was calculated. The sensitivity and accuracy of the probability scale was 71 % (CONSORT). Thus, an intraoperative assessment of the severity of the adhesive process allows us to predict the likelihood of postoperative external intestinal fistula.
About the Authors
N. I. AyushinovaRussian Federation
NataliaI. Ayushinova - Cand. Sc. (Med.), Research Officer at the Scientific Department of Clinical Surgery, Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology; Associate Professor at the Department of Advanced Level Surgery, ISMU.
Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003; Krasnogo Vosstaniya str. 1, Irkutsk 664003
E. E. Chepurnykh
Russian Federation
ElenaE. Chepurnykh - Cand. Sc. (Med.), Academic Secretary, Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology; Associate Professor at the Department of Advanced Level Surgery, ISMU.
Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003; Krasnogo Vosstaniya str. 1, Irkutsk 664003
I. A. Shurygina
Russian Federation
Irina A. Shurygina - Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor of RAS, Deputy Director for Science.
Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003
E. G. Grigoriev
Russian Federation
Grigoriev Evgeniy Georgievich - Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of RAS, Academic Advisor, Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology; Head of the Department of Advanced Level Surgery, ISMU.
Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003; Krasnogo Vosstaniya str. 1, Irkutsk 664003
References
1. Ayushinova N, Shurygina I, Chepurnykh E, Shurygin M, Grigoriev E. Peritoneal commissures of abdominal cavity - a crossdisciplinary problem. Vrach. 2017; (5): 8-10. (In Russ.)
2. Lutsevich OE, Akimov VP, Shirinskiy VG, Bichev AA. Peritoneal commissures of abdominal cavity: modern view on pathogenesis and treatment. Khirurgiya. Zhurnalim. N.I. Pirogova. 2017; (10): 100-108. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201710100-10. (In Russ.)
3. Andreev AA, Ostroushko AP, Kiryanova DV, Sotnikova ES, et al. Peritoneal commissures of abdominal cavity. Vestnik eksperimental'noy i klinicheskoy khirurgii. 2017; 11(4): 320-326. (In Russ.)
4. Chekmazov IA. Peritoneal commissures of abdominal cavity. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2008. (In Russ.)
5. Admyan LV, Kozachenko AV, Kondratovich LM. Peritoneal commissures of abdominal cavity: history of study, classification, pathogenesis (review of literature). Problemy reproduktsii. 2013; 19(6): 7-13. (In Russ.)
6. Ayushinova NI, Shurygina IA, Shurygin MG, Grigoriev EG. Nosocomial epidemiology ofperitoneal commissures of abdominal cavity. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2016; 1(4): 115-118. (In Russ.)
7. Ouaissi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N, Deneve E, et al. Postoperative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. J Visc Surg. 2012; 149(2): e104-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.11.006.
8. Filenko BP, Zemlyanoy VP, Kotkov PA. Treatment and prevention of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. Vestnik Severo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. I.I. Mechnikova. 2017; 9(1): 68-72. (In Russ.)
9. Ten Broek RPG, Krielen P, Di Saverio S, Coccoliniet F, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2018; 13(1): 24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0185-2
10. Almabaev YA, Kyzhyrov ZhN, Akzholova ND, Fakhradiev IR, et al. To the problem of prevention of adhesive process (review of literature). Nauka i mir. 2016; 3(31): 70-72. (In Russ.)
11. Ayushinova NI, Shurygina IA, Grigoriev EG, Chepurnykh EE, Shurygin MG. Assessment of intensity of adhesive process in abdominal cavity (clinical study). Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2018; (6): 23. doi: 10.17513/spno.28209. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ayushinova N.I., Chepurnykh E.E., Shurygina I.A., Grigoriev E.G. Adhesive Process of the Abdominal Cavity as a Risk Factor for the Development of Postoperative Intestinal Fistula. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(6):128-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.6.20