Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.1.16

Abstract

Background. Laparostomy (open abdomen) is an aggressive surgical treatment of peritonitis and it requires justification of its effectiveness. Aims. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of laparostomy and planned rehabilitation in patients with common purulent peritonitis.

Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of the results of laparostomy and planned sanations in patients with common purulent peritonitis. The study included 101 case histories. Inclusion criteria: generalized purulent peritonitis established in the primary surgical intervention that required the implementation of laparotomy. The excluded from the study were immunocompromised patients, hemodialysis patients, patients with pancreatic necrosis, closed abdominal trauma, class C liver cirrhosis, carcinomatosis, cancer cachexia, disseminated tuberculosis, total mesenteric thrombosis. In statistic processing we used indicators of median and inter quartile ranges, methods of nonparametric statistics (Mann – Whitney criterion). The level of significance was α = 0.05.

Results. The whole group is divided into three subgroups according to MPI: subgroup I – 20 people, subgroup II – 57, subgroup III – 24. The method of planned sanation of the abdominal cavity in combination with laparostomy was applied in 34 cases (33.6 %). In the first subgroup in two cases (10 %), in the second – in 18 (31.6 %), in the third – 14 (58.3 %). The deceased, regardless of the chosen surgical technique, were characterized by higher values of integral scales. The severity of the condition of the surviving patients in which the technique was used at the time of admission was significantly higher than the severity of the surviving patients, in which laparostomy SAPS II was not used (p = 0.4716). However, their age was significantly older (p = 0.5476). The deceased patients were older 60 years with high rates on the above mentioned integrated scales.

Conclusions. The results showed that patients older than 60 years, II & III on MPI and with high values of integral scales require more balanced and differential approach when using laparostomy (open abdomen).

About the Authors

Yaroslav M. Leshchishin
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 1
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Med.), Surgeon


Ildar G. Mugatasimov
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 1
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Surgical Unit N 1, Director of the Clinic of Surgery


Andrey I. Baranov
Novokuznetsk State Institute of Advanced Medical Training – Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Surgery, Urology and Endoscopy


Konstantin V. Potekhin
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 22
Russian Federation
Surgeon


Sergey A. Yaroshchuk
Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 29
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Med.), Surgeon


References

1. Gostishchev VK, Sazhin VP, Avdovenko AL. Peritonitis. M.: Meditsina; 2001. (In Russ.)

2. Savelyev VS, Gelfand BR, Filimonov MI. (eds.) Peritonitis: practical guideline. M.: Litterra; 2006. (In Russ.)

3. Buzunov AF. Laparostomy. Treatment of surgical abdominal diseases using management of the open abdomen. M.: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2008. (In Russ.)

4. Bykov AD, Zhigaev GF, Khitrikheev VE, Budasheev VP. Laparostomy in widespread purulent peritonitis, practical recommendations on its diagnostics and complex treatment. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2010; (3): 33-35. (In Russ.)

5. Shturich IP. Laparotomy and staged sanation of the abdominal cavity in treatment of severe forms of widespread peritonitis. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2005; 4(3): 5-13. (In Russ.)

6. Coccolini F, Biffl W, Catena F, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, et al. The open abdomen, indications, management and definitive closure. World J Emerg Surg. 2015; 10: 32. doi: 10.1186/ s13017-015-0026-5

7. Quyn AJ, Johnston C, Hall D, Chambers A, Arapova N, Ogston S, et al. The open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure systems – historical evolution and systematic review. Colorectal Disease. 2012; 14(8): 429-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1463- 1318.2012.03045.x

8. Cheatham ML, Demetrides D, Fabian TC, Kaplan MJ, Miles WS, Schreiber MA, et al. Prospective study examining clinical outcomes associated with negative pressure wound therapy system and Barker’s vacuum packing technique. World J Surg. 2013; 37(9): 2018-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2080-z

9. Haddock C, Konkin DE, Blair NP. Management of the open abdomen with the Abdominal Reapproximation Anchor dynamic fascial closure system. Am J Surg. 2013; 205(5): 528-533. doi 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.028

10. Torgunakov AP, Torgunakov SA. History of staged treatment of purulent peritonitis using laparotomy (to the 23rd anniversary of the first laparotomy in Kuzbass). Medicine Meditsina v Kuzbasse. 2007; 6(1): 8-11. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Leshchishin Ya.M., Mugatasimov I.G., Baranov A.I., Potekhin K.V., Yaroshchuk S.A. The Results of the Planned Relaparotomy and Laparostomy in Treatment of Generalized Purulent Peritonitis. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(1):107-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.1.16

Views: 902


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)