Epizootological and epidemiological situation of anthrax in Siberia and the Far East (1985–2023)

Anthrax remains relevant in the world and in the Russian Federation. In Siberia and the Far East, epizootological, epidemiological, environmental and microbiological monitoring of anthrax is constantly carried out. To analyze the epizootological and epidemiological situation of anthrax, we used the information from veterinary institutions and Rospotrebnadzor for 24 regions, as well as reference and archive materials. On the territory of Siberia and the Far East for the period from 1985 to 2023, pronounced epizootological and epidemiological problems of anthrax are observed in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, the Republic of Buryatia, Omsk Region and the Altai Territory. Over the last five-year observation period, high epizootic activity has been observed in the west of the Republic of Tyva. A total of 3,375 livestock animals and 128 people fell ill. The anthrax database contains information on 7,491 stationary anthrax-infected points in 22 subjects and 562 anthrax burials and cattle burials in 17 subjects of Siberia and the Far East. B. anthracis strains have slight variability in biological properties and belong to two global genetic lines – A and B. In order to prevent anthrax, it is necessary to ensure surveillance of soil foci of anthrax (anthrax burials and cattle burials, “plague fields”), a high level of livestock animals registration and their specific vaccination coverage; to control the implementation of veterinary and sanitary requirements for pre-mortem inspection and emergency slaughter of livestock, the sale of meat and meat products, and biological waste disposal; to carry out explanatory work among the population.

1. Bobrysheva OV, Pisarenko SV, Kovalev DA, Eremenko EI, Rjazanova AG, Semenova OV, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus anthracis strains isolated in the Republic of Dagestan. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2023; 18(1): 29-32. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14300/mnnc.2023.18007

2. Cherkassky BL. Epidemiology and prevention of anthrax. Moscow: INTERSEN; 2002. (In Russ.).

3. Dugarzhapova ZF, Chesnokova MV, Gol’dapel’ EG, Kosilko SA, Innokent’eva ТI, Balakhonov SV. Anthrax in the Asian part of the Russian Federation. Communication 1. Historical remarks on the spread of the disease in Siberia and Far East. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2017; (1): 54-58. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2017-1-54-58

4. Dyagilev GT, Chernyavsky VF, Ignatieva ME, Sofronova ON, Nikiforov OI. Epizootological and epidemiological monitoring of anthrax in the Central and Southern zones of Yakutia. Yakut Medical Journal. 2018; (2): 96-100. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25789/YMJ.2018.62.29

5. Kurganova OP, Yurgina OM, Kobzar VP, Sabluk NR, Sorokoumova OF, Dvininidze EV, et al. Opening unknown pages... From the history of sanitary affairs in the Amur region (late XIX – early XX centuries). Blagoveshchensk-on-Amur: Amurskaya yarmarka; 2022. (In Russ.).

6. Gorkovenko LE, Turkutyukov VB, Olenov AB, Borzov VP. The cases of anthrax in Primorsky Region in 1904–1980. Pacific Medical Journal. 2003; 2(12): 54-55. (In Russ.).

7. Popova AYu, Demina YuV, Ezhlova EB, Kulichenko AN, Ryazanova AG, Buravtseva NP, et al. Anthrax abortion in Yamal in 2016. Izhevsk: Print-2 LLC; 2017. (In Russ.).

8. Popova AYu, Demina YuV, Ezhlova EB, Kulichenko AN, Ryazanova AG, Maleev VV, et al. Outbreak of anthrax in the YamaloNenets Autonomous District in 2016, epidemiological peculiarities. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2016; (4): 42-46. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2016-4-42-46

9. Ryazanova AG, Skudareva ON, Gerasimenko DK, Logvin FV, Aksenova LYu, Semenova OV, et al. Analysis of the situation on anthrax in the world in 2022, the forecast for the Russian Federation for 2023. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2023; (2): 88-94. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2023-2-88-94

10. Keim P, Price LB, Klevytska AM, Smith KL, Schupp JM, Okinawa R, et al. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis reveals genetic relationships within Bacillus anthracis. J Bacter. 2000; 182(10): 2928-2936. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.10.29282936.2000

11. Van Ert MN, Easterday WR, Huynh LY, Okinaka RT, HughJones ME, Ravel J, et al. Global genetic population structure of Bacillus anthracis. PLoS One. 2007; 2(5): e461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000461

12. Aikembayev AM, Lukhnova L, Temiraliyeva G, MekaMechenko T, Pazylov Y, Zakaryan S, et al. Historical distribution and molecular diversity of Bacillus anthracis, Kazakhstan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010; 16(5): 789-796. doi: 10.3201/eid1605.091427

13. Okutani A, Tungalag H, Boldbaatar B, Yamada A, Tserennorov D, Otgonchimeg I, et al. Molecular epidemiological study of Bacillus anthracis isolated in Mongolia by multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for 8 loci (MLVA-8). Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011; 64(4): 345-348.

14. Simonson TS, Okinaka RT, Wang B, Easterday WR, Huynh L, U’Ren JM, et al. Bacillus anthracis in China and its relationship to worldwide lineages. BMC Microbiol. 2009; 9: 71. doi: 10.1186/14712180-9-71

15. Eremenko EI, Ryazanova AG, Pechkovskii GA, Pisarenko SV, Kovalev DA, Aksenova LY, et al. Polymorphism of spore germination receptor genes in Bacillus anthracis strains of major genetic lineages. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2023; 100(3): 155-165. (In Russ.). doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-385