Psychometric properties of abbreviated math anxiety scale in Russian high schoolers
J. A. Marakshina,
A. A. Pavlova,
V. I. Ismatullina,
M. M. Lobaskova,
T. V. Adamovich,
S. A. Mironets,
M. A. Sitnikova,
S. B. Malykh https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2024-9.1.16
Abstract
Background. Math anxiety is a state of fear and anxiety that an individual experiences when interacting with mathematical problems. Currently, there is a lack of questionnaires to measure mathematical anxiety for Russian-speaking schoolchildren.
The aim. The study analyzed the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS).
Materials and methods. The study involved 1,198 schoolchildren in grades 10–11. The psychometric properties of the AMAS were analyzed.
Results. AMAS demonstrated bifactor structure: subscales of Learning Math Anxiety (LMA) and Math Evaluation Anxiety (MEA) and general scale of Math Anxiety. The bifactor model demonstrated the best fit indices. Analysis confirmed reliable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas for LMA = 0.82, MEA = 0.75, total AMAS = 0.95). External validity of AMAS has been confirmed. LMA showed lower scores than MEA. The distribution of scores on the general AMAS scale was shifted to low values. Girls showed higher scores on all scales of the questionnaire. The analysis also confirmed measurement invariance for both boys and girls.
Conclusion. Based on the analysis, we can conclude that the AMAS is a valid tool for assessing mathematical anxiety in high school students.
About the Authors
J. A. Marakshina
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Julia A. Marakshina – Cand. Sc. (Psychol.), Chief Analyst at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education,
Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121
A. A. Pavlova
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Pavlova – Chief Specialist at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education,
Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121
V. I. Ismatullina
Federal Research Center of Psychological and Interdisciplinary Studies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria I. Ismatullina – Cand. Sc. (Psychol.), Leading Research Officer at the Laboratory of Developmental Behavioral Genetics,
Mokhovaya str. 9 buiding 4, Moscow 125009
M. M. Lobaskova
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina M. Lobaskova – Cand. Sc. (Psychol.), Chief Specialist at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education,
Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121
T. V. Adamovich
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Timofey V. Adamovich – Chief Specialist at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education,
Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121
S. A. Mironets
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sofia A. Mironets – Chief Specialist at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education,
Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121
M. A. Sitnikova
Russian Academy of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Sitnikova – Cand. Sc. (Psychol.), Chief Analyst at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education,
Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121
S. B. Malykh
Russian Academy of Education;
Federal Research Center of Psychological and Interdisciplinary Studies
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey B. Malykh – Dr. Sc. (Psychol.), Academic Advisor of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Education, Pogodinskaya str. 8, Moscow 119121;
Head of the Laboratory of Developmental Behavioral Genetics, Mokhovaya str. 9 buiding 4, Moscow 125009
References
1. Budakova AV, Likhanov MV, Blonievski T, Malykh SB, Kovas YuV. Math anxiety: Etiology, development and relationship with success in mathematics. Voprosy Psychologii. 2020; 1: 109-118. (In Russ.).
2. Wang Z, Lukowski SL, Hart SA, Lyons IM, Thompson LA, Kovas Y, et al. Is math anxiety always bad for math learning? The role of math motivation. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(12): 1863-1876. doi: 10.1177/0956797615602471
3. Malanchini M, Rimfeld K, Shakeshaft NG, Rodic M, Schofield K, Selzam S, et al. The genetic and environmental aetiology of spatial, mathematics and general anxiety. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 42218. doi: 10.1038/srep42218
4. Beilock SL, Rydell RJ, McConnell AR. Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007; 136(2): 256. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256
5. Vukovic RK, Roberts SO, Green Wright L. From parental involvement to children’s mathematical performance: The role of mathematics anxiety. Early Educ Dev. 2013; 24(4): 446-467. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2012.693430
6. Goetz T, Bieg M, Lüdtke O, Pekrun R, Hall NC. Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics? Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(10): 2079-2087. doi: 10.1177/0956797613486989
7. Ramirez G, Hooper SY, Kersting NB, Ferguson R, Yeager D. Teacher math anxiety relates to adolescent students’ math achievement. AERA Open. 2018; 4(1): 2332858418756052. doi: 10.1177/2332858418756052
8. Ashcraft MH, Krause JA. Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14: 243-248. doi: 10.3758/BF03194059
9. Lyons IM, Beilock SL. When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PloS One. 2012; 7(10): e48076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048076
10. Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion. 2007; 7(2): 336. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
11. Fournier KA, Couret J, Ramsay JB, Caulkins JL. Using collaborative two‐stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course. Anat Sci Educ. 2017; 10(5): 409-422. doi: 10.1002/ase.1677
12. Xie F, Xin Z, Chen X, Zhang L. Gender difference of Chinese high school students’ math anxiety: The effects of self-esteem, test anxiety and general anxiety. Sex Roles. 2019; 81: 235-244. doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0982-9
13. Szczygiel M. Gender, general anxiety, math anxiety and math achievement in early school-age children. Iss Educ Res. 2020; 30(3): 1126-1142. doi: 10.3316/informit.465488906598804
14. Tomasetto C. Gender stereotypes, anxiety, and math outcomes in adults and children. In: Mathematics Anxiety. Routledge; 2019: 178-189. doi: 10.1177/1073191103010002008
15. Hopko DR, Mahadevan R, Bare RL, Hunt MK. The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS) construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment. 2003; 10(2): 178-182. doi: 10.1177/10731911 03010002008
16. Cohen LA, Limbers CA. Factor structure and gender invariance of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in middle school students. Trends Psychol. 2022; 30(4): 788-807. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00167-6
17. Cipora K, Szczygieł M, Willmes K, Nuerk HC. Math anxiety assessment with the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: Applicability and usefulness: Insights from the Polish adaptation. Front Psychol. 2015; 6: 1833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01833
18. Schillinger FL, Vogel SE, Diedrich J, Grabner RH. Math anxiety, intelligence, and performance in mathematics: Insights from the German adaptation of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS-G). Learn Individ Differ. 2018; 61: 109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.014
19. Martín-Puga ME, Justicia-Galiano MJ, Gómez-Pérez MM, Pelegrina S. Psychometric properties, factor structure, and gender and educational level invariance of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in Spanish children and adolescents. Assessment. 2022; 29(3): 425-440. doi: 10.1177/1073191120980064
20. Kamoi R, Kobayashi K. Why is the Mahalanobis distance effective for anomaly detection? arXiv.org. 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2003.00402
21. Ghorbani H. Maxalanobis distance and its application for detecting multivariate outliers. Facta Universitatis. Series Mathematics and Informatics. 2019; 34(3): 583-595. doi: 10.22190/ FUMI1903583G
22. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (“Self-evaluation questionnaire”). Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.
23. Ismatullina V, Adamovich T, Zakharov I, Vasin G, Voronin I. The place of gender stereotypes in the network of cognitive abilities, self-perceived ability and intrinsic value of school in school children depending on sex and preferences in STEM. Behav Sci. 2022; 12(3): 75. doi: 10.3390/bs12030075
24. Cipora K, Santos FH, Kucian K, Dowker A. Mathematics anxiety – Where are we and where shall we go? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022; 1513(1): 10-20. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14770
25. Lyneham HJ, Street AK, Abbott MJ, Rapee RM. Psychometric properties of the school anxiety scale – Teacher report (SAS-TR). J Anxiety Disord. 2008; 22(2): 292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.001
26. Egorenko TA, Lobanova AV, Chumachenko DV. Results of standardization of the Phillips School Anxiety Test [Dataset]. RusPsyData: Repozitorii psikhologicheskikh issledovanii I instrumentov. 2023. (In Russ.). doi: 10.48612/MSUPE/417h-9km5-fx9t
27. Egorenko TA, Lobanova AV, Chumachenko DV. Phillips School Anxiety Test: Results of standardization of the Russian version of the Phillips School Anxiety Test. Bulletin of Psychological Practice in Education. 2023; 20(3): 39-54. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17759/bppe.2023200303
28. Borisova NA, Belobrykina OA, Geidebrekht NA, Shtaits TK. Math anxiety: Diagnostic contradictions (based on the example of analysis of B. Phillips methodology). PEM: Psychology. Educology. Medicine. 2016; 2: 123-165.
29. Núñez-Peña MI, Guilera G. Development and validation of the brief Math Anxiety Scale (BMAS) in university students. Psicothema. 2023; 35(4): 406-413. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2022.434
30. Buratta L, Piccirilli M, Lanfaloni GA, Ilicini S, Bedetti C, Elisei S. Mathematics anxiety and cognitive performance in adolescent students. Psychiatr Danub. 2019; 31: 479-485.
31. Gibeau RM, Maloney EA, Béland S, Lalande D, Cantinotti M, Williot A, et al. The correlates of statistics anxiety: Relationships with spatial anxiety, mathematics anxiety and gender. J Numer Cogn, 2023; 9(1): 16-43. doi: 10.5964/jnc.8199
32. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007; 14(3): 464- 504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
33. Sadiković S, Milovanović I, Oljača M. Another psychometric proof of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale usefulness: IRT analysis. Primenjena Psihologija. 2018; 11(3): 301-323. doi: 10.19090/pp.2018.3.301-323
Review
For citations:
Marakshina J.A., Pavlova A.A., Ismatullina V.I., Lobaskova M.M., Adamovich T.V., Mironets S.A., Sitnikova M.A., Malykh S.B. Psychometric properties of abbreviated math anxiety scale in Russian high schoolers. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2024;9(1):151-160. https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2024-9.1.16
Views:
678
Email this article 
