CRITERIA OF ASSESSMENT OF HIGH SPINAL ANESTHESIA EFFICIENCY IN UPPER ABDOMEN SURGERIES
https://doi.org/10.12737/article_59fad5188da375.49732053
Abstract
In recent years, the frequency of application of regional anesthesia methods, and especially in economically developed countries, has progressively increased. This paper presents the experience of high spinal anesthesia during operations on the upper part of the abdominal cavity in 112 patients. We have developed and proposed a method of simultaneous high spinal anesthesia, with the development of high neuromuscular block to the level of the first and second thoracic vertebrae. By its simplicity and technique, as well as by maintenance high spinal anesthesia is close to epidural analgesia, but unlike that it provides adequate, long-lasting and high level of pain relief of the abdominal organs. Compared to "traditional" methods of pain relief high spinal anesthesia reduces the risk of thromboembolic complications, decreases the amount of blood loss, reduces risk of developing complications from respiratory and cardiovascular systems, reduces the duration of postoperative paresis of the intestine. The use of high spinal anesthesia during operations on the upper part of the abdominal cavity is the method of choice. This type of anesthesia has advantages over other types of pain relief, and is better tolerated by patients. The proposed technique of regional anesthesia - high spinal anesthesia - has broad prospects for use in clinical practice.
About the Authors
A. B. Yakushevskiy
Buryat State University; Railway Clinical Hospital at the Station of Ulan-Ude
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. N. Plekhanov
Buryat State University; Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Zharnikov
Buryat State University; Railway Clinical Hospital at the Station of Ulan-Ude
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Барах П.Д., Куллен Б.Ф., Стэлтинг Р.К. Клиническая анестезия. - М.: Медицина, 2007. - 300 с
2. Боровских Н.А., Розенгард С.А. Медикаментозное обеспечение продлённой субарахноидальной анестезии // Матер. межрегион. науч.-практ. конф. хирургов «Малоинвазивные технологии в хирургии». - Махачкала, 2006. - С. 61-62
3. Витенбек И.А., Коваленко Г.А., Исангулова С.Г. Побочные реакции и осложнения эпидуральной аналгезии местными анестетиками и наркотическими анальгетиками // Анестезиология и реаниматология. - 1987. - № 5. - С. 62-66
4. Гайкович А.А. Проблемы обезболивания родов: бупивакаин или ропивакаин // Тез. докл. VIII Всерос. съезда анестезиологов и реаниматологов. - Омск, 2004. - С. 46-47.
5. Корячкин В.А., Страшнов В.И. Спинномозговая и эпидуральная анестезия. - СПб., 2000. - 238 с
6. Кузин М.И., Харнас С.Ш. Местное обезболивание. - М.: Медицина, 1982. - 143 с
7. Никода В.В., Бондаренко А.В. Постоянная эпидуральная инфузия ропивакаина в послеоперационном периоде // Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2006. - № 5. - С. 76-79
8. Овечкин А.М., Гнездилов А.В. Наропин (ропивакаин) в лечении боли: идеальный выбор? // Вестник интенсивной терапии. - 2000. - № 3. - С. 13-17
9. Способ высокой спинальной анестезии при операциях на верхнем этаже брюшной полости: Патент 2599044 Рос. Федерация; МПК А61М19 00 / Плеханов А.Н., Якушевский А.Б.; заявитель и патентообладатель ФГБОУ ВПО «Бурятский государственный университет». - № 2015134630; заявл. 17.08.2015; опубл. 10.10.2016
10. Штабницкий А.М. Ропивакаин - альтернатива бупивакаину в акушерстве // Вестник интенсивной терапии. - 2001. - № 1. - С. 51-54
11. Шурыгин И.А. Спинальная анестезия при кесаревом сечении. - СПб.: Диалект, 2004. - 192 с
12. Alley E.A. (2008). Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: a comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth. Analg., 94, 188-193.
13. Atanassoff P.G, Ocampo C.A. (2006) Ropivacaine 0,2% and Lidocaine 0,5% for intravenous regional anesthesia in outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology, 95, 627-631.
14. Berti M, Casati A, Fanelli G. (2007) Ropivacaine 0, 2% with or without fentanyl for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery: a double-blind study. Anesthesiol., 12, 292-297.
15. Carvalho A.C. (2007) Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine: a comparative study. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 52, 659-665.
16. Fritz B.A. (2016) Convergent validity of three methods for measuring postoperative complications. Anesthesiol., 12, 89-91.
17. Horlocker T.T. (2005) Neurologic complication of spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg. Anest. Pain Med., 25, 83-98.
18. Tanaka E. (2016). Lidocaine concentration in oral tissue by the addition of epinephrine. Anesth. Prog., 63, 17-24.
Review
For citations:
Yakushevskiy A.B., Plekhanov A.N., Zharnikov A.V. CRITERIA OF ASSESSMENT OF HIGH SPINAL ANESTHESIA EFFICIENCY IN UPPER ABDOMEN SURGERIES. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2017;2(4):74-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/article_59fad5188da375.49732053
Views:
998
Email this article 
