Characteristics of online behavior and structure of consumed content in Abakan adolescents of different age, groups and ethnicity

Background. The study of the prevalence and structure of various types of online behavior, the characteristics of the content consumed by adolescents of different age, sex and ethnic groups is an important area of scientific research.

The aim. To study the features of online behavior and the structure of content consumed in Abakan adolescents of various age and sex groups and ethnicity (Russians and Khakasses).

Materials and methods. 1400 adolescents of the city of Abakan (Republic of Khakassia) aged 12–18 were examined: 962 (68.7 %) Russians, 438  (31.3  %) Khakasses, 678 (48.4 %) boys and 722 (51.6 %) girls, aged 12–14 years – 39.8 % and 15–18 years – 60.2 %. The type of online behavior was verified using the Chen scale (CIAS). Emotional and behavioral disorders were diagnosed using the SDQ questionnaire. The indicators were compared in groups formed by sex, age and ethnicity. The data were processed using the Statistica 12.0 program (StatSoft Inc., USA).

Results. It has been established that the prevalence and structure of online behavior among adolescents in Abakan depends on gender, age and ethnicity. Pathological Internet use (PIU) is more common among Khakasses, more often in the older age group. Regardless of ethnicity, maladaptive online behavior (pathological and maladaptive Internet use) is recorded more often among girls. In the structure of consumed content, gaming addiction prevails, social network addiction is in second place, and the proportion of mixed and undifferentiated Internet addiction is less. Dependence on online games prevails in boys, while dependence on social networks and undifferentiated internet addiction prevail in girls.

Conclusion. One of the reasons for the greater prevalence of maladaptive online behavior among Khakasses may be the association of maladaptive Internet use with the presence of emotional disorders and behavioral problems that reach the borderline level and are causally significant factors in the development of Internet addiction. Adolescents with maladaptive online behavior, who have not yet reached the level of formed Internet addiction, are the target group requiring medical and psychological assistance.

1. UKEssays. Internet addiction among adolescents (November 2018). URL: https://www.ukessays.com/essays/technology/internet-addiction-among-adolescents.php?vref=1 [date of access: 15.03.2021].

2. Neuenschwander M. Online addictive disease. Ther Umsch. 2014; 71(10): 599-607. [In German]. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000559

3. Evert LS, Tereshchenko SY, ZaitsevaOI, SemenovaNB, Shubina MV. Psychosomatic comorbidity in Krasnoyarsk adolescents with various types of online behavior. Profilakticheskaya meditsina. 2020; 23(2): 78-84. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/profmed20202302178

4. Effat S, Azab H, Aly H, Mahmoud O. The relationship between anxiety, depression, and problematic internet use among a sample of university students in Egypt. Sohag Med J. 2019; 23(1): 169-180. doi: 10.21608/smj.2019.41384

5. Reiner IA, Tibubos N, Hardt J, Müller К, Wölfling К, Beutel МЕ. Peer attachment, specific patterns of internet use and problematic internet use in male and female adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017; 26(10): 1257-1268. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-0984-0

6. Malygin VL, Khomeriki NS, Antonenko AA. Individual psychological properties of adolescents as risk factors for the formation of Internet-dependent behavior. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii. 2015; 1(30): 1-12. (In Russ.).

7. Ragulina MV. Emotional distress of Internet-dependent adolescents. Nauchnye tendentsii: Pedagogika i psikhologiya: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam XII mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. 2017; 38-42. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18411/spc-04-12-2017-24

8. Varlamova S, Goncharova E, Sokolova I. Internet addiction of young people of megacities: Criteria and typology. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2015; 2(126): 165-182. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2015.2.11

9. Pontes HM, Kuss D, Griffiths М. Clinical psychology of Internet addiction: A review of its conceptualization, prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment. Neurosci Neuroeconomics. 2015; 4: 11-23. doi: 10.2147/NAN.S60982

10. Bezrukova ON, Samoilova VA. Ethnic identity of children in interethnic families in the context of parenting culture. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2019; 22(3): 113-140. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31119/jssa.2019.22.3.5

11. Sikevich ZV, Possel YuA. Structure and typology of ethnic identity of members of interethnic and mono-ethnic families (comparative analysis). Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2019; 25(1): 121-136. (In Russ.). doi: 10.19181/socjour.2018.25.1.6282

12. Akosta A, Kazakova TV. The influence of interethnic marriage on the ethnocultural identity of a teenager. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2012; 3(107): 166-170. (In Russ.).

13. Semenova NB, Tereshchenko SYu, Evert LS, Zaitseva ОI, Shubina MV. Prevalence of internet-addiction among adolescents of Central Siberia. Health Care of the Russian Federation. 2020; 64(1): 36-44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18821/0044-197X-2020-64-1-36-44

14. Durkee T, Kaess М, Carli V, Parzer Р, Wasserman С, Floderus В, et al. Prevalence of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: Demographic and social factors. Addiction. 2012; 107(12): 2210-2222. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03946.x

15. Durkee T, Carli V, Floderus В, Wasserman С, Sarchiapone М, Apter А, et al. Pathological Internet use and risk-behaviours among European adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(3): 294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030294

16. Chen S-H, Weng L-J, Su Y-J, Wu H-M., Yang PF. Development of a Chinese Internet Addiction Scale and its psychometric study. Chin J Physiol. 2003; 45(3): 279-294.

17. Malygin VL, Feklisov KA. Internet-dependent behavior. Diagnostic criteria and methods. Moscow: MGMSU; 2011. (In Russ.).

18. Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Development and validation of a Game Addiction Scale for Adolescents. Media Psychol. 2009; 12(1): 77-95. doi: 10.1080/15213260802669458

19. van den Eijnden RJJM, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM. The Social Media Disorder Scale. Comput Hum Behav. 2016; 61: 478-487. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038

20. Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H. Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 177: 534-539. doi: 10.1080/0954026021000046128

21. Egorov AYu, Soldatkin VA. Internet addiction: Clinical diagnostic markers and approaches to therapy. Moscow: RUSAJNS; 2020. (In Russ.).

22. Voiskunsky AE. Current problems of Internet addiction. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2004; 25(1): 90-100. (In Russ.).

23. Shek DTL, Yu L. Internet addiction phenomenon in early adolescents in Hong Kong. Sci World J. 2012; 2012: 104304. doi: 10.1100/2012/104304

24. Lee HW, Choi JS, Shin YC, Lee JY, Jung HY, Kwon JS. Impulsivity in internet addiction: A comparison with pathological gambling. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012; 15(7): 373-377. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0063

25. Mazhari S. Association between problematic Internet use and impulse control disorders among Iranian university students. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012; 15(5): 270-273. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0548

26. Ho RC, Thiaghu C, Ong H, Lu Y, Ho CS, Tam WW, et al. A meta-analysis of serum and cerebrospinal fluid autoantibodies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. 2016; 15(2): 124-138. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.10.003

27. Asrese K, Muche H. Online activities as risk factors for Problematic internet use among students in Bahir Dar University, North West Ethiopia: A hierarchical regression model. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9): e0238804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238804

28. Kojima R, Sato M, Akiyama Y, Shinohara R, Mizorogi S, Suzuki K, et al. Problematic Internet use and its associations with health-related symptoms and lifestyle habits among rural Japanese adolescents. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019; 73(1): 20-26. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12791

29. Balhara YРS, Doric A, Stevanovic D, Knez R, Singh S, Chowdhury MRR, et al. Correlates of problematic internet use among college and university students in eight countries: An international cross-sectional study. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019; 45: 113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.09.004

30. Vadher SB, Panchal BN, Vala AU, Ratnani IJ, Vasava KJ, Desai RS, et al. Predictors of problematic Internet use in school going adolescents of Bhavnagar, India. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019; 65(2): 151-157. doi: 10.1177/0020764019827985

31. Veisani Y, Jalilian Z, Mohamadian F. Relationship between internet addiction and mental health in adolescents. J Educ Health Promot. 2020; 9: 303. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_362_20

32. Mei S, Yau YHC, Chai J, Guo J, Potenza MN. Problematic Internet use, well-being, self-esteem and self-control: Data from a high-school survey in China. Addict Behav. 2016; 61: 74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.009

33. Thabet JB, Ellouze AS, Ghorbel N, Maalej M, Yaich S, Omri S, et al. Factors associated with Internet addiction among Tunisian adolescents. Encephale. 2019; 45(6): 474-481. [In French]. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.05.006

34. Bener A, Bhugra D. Lifestyle and depressive risk factors associated with problematic internet use in adolescents in an Arabian Gulf culture. J Addict Med. 2013; 7(4): 236-242. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3182926b1f

35. Semenova NB, Tereshchenko SYu, Evert LS, Shubina MV. Prevalence and mental comorbidity of Internet-addicted behavior among adolescents in Central Siberia. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2021; 121(5): 105-110. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/jnevro2021121051105

36. Tereshchenko SY, Smolnikova MV. Neurobiological risk factors in the formation of internet addiction in adolescence: vital hypotheses and the nearest perspectives. Social Psychology and Society. 2020; 11(1): 55-71. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17759/sps.2020110104

37. Li M, Chen J, Li N, Li X. A twin study of problematic internet use: its heritability and genetic association with effortful control. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2014; 17(4): 279-287. doi: 10.1017/thg.2014.32

38. Vink JM, Van Beijsterveldt TC, Huppertz C, Bartels M, Boomsma DI. Heritability of compulsive Internet use in adolescents. Addict Biol. 2016; 21(2): 460-468. doi: 10.1111/adb.12218

39. Long EC, Verhulst B, Neale MC, Lind PA, Hickie IB, Martin NG, et al. The genetic and environmental contributions to internet use and associations with psychopathology: A twin study. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016; 19(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1017/thg.2015.91

40. Hahn E, Reuter M, Spinath FM, Montag C. Internet addiction and its facets: The role of genetics and the relation to selfdirectedness. Addict Behav. 2017; 65: 137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.10.018

41. Yates TM, Gregor MA, Haviland MG. Child maltreatment, alexithymia, and problematic internet use in young adulthood. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012; 15(4): 219-225. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0427

42. Park B, Han DH, Roh S. Neurobiological findings related to Internet use disorders. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017; 71(7): 467-478. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12422

43. Yuan K, Cheng P, Dong T, Bi Y, Xing L, Yu D, et al. Cortical thickness abnormalities in late adolescence with online gaming addiction. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1): e53055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053055

44. Hong SB, Zalesky A, Cocchi L, Fornito A, Choi EJ, Kim HH, et al. Decreased functional brain connectivity in adolescents with internet addiction. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e57831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057831

45. Liu J, Gao XP, Osunde I, Li X, Zhou SK, Zheng HR, et al. Increased regional homogeneity in internet addiction disorder: A resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123(14): 1904-1908.

46. Park HS, Kim SH, Bang SA, Yoon EJ, Cho SS, Kim SE. Altered regional cerebral glucose metabolism in internet game overusers: A 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study. CNS Spectr. 2010; 15(3): 159-166. doi: 10.1017/S1092852900027437

47. Dong G, Zhou H, Zhao X. Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neurosci Lett. 2010; 485(2): 138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.002

48. Weinstein A, Livny A, Weizman A. New developments in brain research of internet and gaming disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017; 75: 314-330. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.040