Comparative analysis of postoperative results of cataract surgery using monofocal IOLs
https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2021-6.6-1.24
Abstract
One of the most common surgical interventions in ophthalmology today is lens replacement surgery. But there is still no consensus on whether the choice of a monofocal IOL affects the postoperative functional outcome.
The aim: to conduct a comparative analysis of values of visual acuity without correction in the early postoperative period after cataract surgery using monofocal IOLs.
Material and methods. The study included data of 2643 eyes operated for cataract, into which one of the monofocal IOLs, included in the top ten most frequently implanted IOLs in the Orenburg Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, was implanted for the period 2019–2021. Statistical analysis was performed using the program Statistica 13.0.
Results. The performed analysis of variance showed that the established differences between the compared groups are statistically signifi cant (p < 0.05). However, the subgroup analysis showed that there were statistically signifi cant differences between pairs such as Tecnis and Hydro-4; Tecnis and Rayner. In all other cases, statistically signifi cant uncorrected visual activity (UCVA) values after surgery were not established. It has also been reliably established that the presence of subluxation of the lens affects the value of UCVA after surgery.
Conclusion. The results of the performed analysis in general indicate that the value of UCVA in patients in the early postoperative period after the performed surgical intervention does not depend on the manufacturer of the used IOL.
About the Authors
A. D. Chuprov
Orenburg Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Director
Salmyshskaya str. 17, Orenburg 460047, Russian Federation
N. A. Zhediale
Ophthalmology Clinic “Sozvezdie”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Deputy Head Physician
Starykh Proizvodstvennikov 18, Nizhniy Novgorod 603123, Russian Federation
M. I. Startseva
Orenburg Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ophthalmologist
Salmyshskaya str. 17, Orenburg 460047, Russian Federation
References
1. Lindstrom RL. Future of cataract surgery seems promising. URL: https://www.healio.com/news/ophthalmology/20210126/futureof-cataract-surgery-seems-promising [date of access: 25.07.2021].
2. Interregional Association of Ophthalmologists (ed.). Federal clinical guidelines for the ophthalmic care for patients with agerelated cataracts. Moscow: Oftalmologiya; 2015. (In Russ.).
3. Pershin KB. The surgery correction of presbyopia: The modern possibilities. Medical Journal of the Russian Federation. 2016; 22(3): 146-152. (In Russ.).
4. Egorov AE, Movsisyan AB, Glazko NG. State-of-the-art cataract surgery. Nuances and solutions. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020; (3): 142-147. (In Russ.). doi: 10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-3-142-147
5. Pérez-Vives C. Biomaterial influence on intraocular lens performance: An overview. J Ophthalmol. 2018; 2018: 2687385. doi: 10.1155/2018/2687385
6. Abela-Formanek C, Amon M, Schild G, Schauersberger J, Heinze G, Kruger A. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002: 28(1): 50-61. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01122-1
7. Tandogan T, Auffarth GU, Choi CY, Liebing S, Mayer C, Khoramnia R. In vitro comparative optical bench analysis of a spherical and aspheric optic design of the same IOL model. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1): 9. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0407-5
8. Caporossi A, Martone G, Casprini F, Rapisarda L. Prospective randomized study of clinical performance of 3 aspheric and 2 spherical intraocular lenses in 250 eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007: 23(7): 639-648. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070901-02
9. Chang DH, Rocha KM. Intraocular lens optics and aberrations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016; 27(4): 298-303. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000279
10. Holladay JT, Piers PA, Kozanyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE. A new intraocular lens designed to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18(6): 683-701.
11. Lombardo M, De Santo MP, Lombardo G, Barberi R, Serrao S. Analysis of intraocular lens surface properties with atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(8): 1378-1384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.068
12. Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A. Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: Review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(1): 172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.01
13. Kim SW, Ahn H, Kim EK, Kim TI. Comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes with aspherical or spherical intraocular lenses. Eye (Lond). 2008; 22(12): 1493-1498. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.302
14. Johansson B, Sundelin S, Wikberg-Matsson A, Unsbo P, Behndig A. Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses: Swedish multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(9): 1565-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.025
15. Awwad ST, Lehmann JD, McCulley JP, Bowman RW. A comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ SN60WF and AcrySof SN60AT intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007; 17(3): 320-326. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700307
16. Mencucci R, Favuzza E, Boccalini C, Gicquel JJ, Raimondi L. Square-edge intraocular lenses and epithelial lens cell proliferation: Implications on posterior capsule opacification in an in vitro model. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15: 5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-15-5
17. Davison JA, Patel AS, Cunha JP, Schwiegerling J, Muftuoglu O. Recent studies provide an updated clinical perspective on blue light-filtering IOLs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 249(7): 957-968. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1697-6
Review
For citations:
Chuprov A.D., Zhediale N.A., Startseva M.I. Comparative analysis of postoperative results of cataract surgery using monofocal IOLs. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2021;6(6-1):214-220. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2021-6.6-1.24
Views:
652
.png)
Email this article 
