Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Ensuring the effectiveness and safety of peripheral blockades

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2021-6.6-1.12

Abstract

Adequate analgesia determines the success of the performed surgical intervention. In modern surgery, most of postoperative complications are directly related to ineffective therapy of pain syndrome in the perioperative period. The main principle of modern analgesia is its multicomponence, when analgesia, neurovegetative blockade and relaxation are achieved and potentiated by different drugs and methods. The blockade of nociceptive impulses with a local anesthetic at the transmission stage provides effective, targeted analgesia, hyporefl exia and muscle relaxation, prevents the sensitization of neuroaxial structures, hyperalgesia and the development of postoperative chronic pain syndrome. At the same time, providing analgesia with drugs of central action leads to the ineffectiveness of therapy in 80 % of cases, which has serious consequences.
The aim. According to the literature review, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of peripheral blockades on the example of performing a blockade of the pterygopalatine ganglion.
Conclusion. The pterygopalatine blockade has broad indications for use in ophthalmology, which is explained by the complex structure of the pterygopalatine ganglion and the possibility of simultaneous infl uence on sympathetic, parasympathetic and nociceptive innervation. All the presented methods of pterygopalatine blockade performance have their advantages and disadvantages. Ultrasound navigation eliminates technical difficulties and the possibility of damage of the pterygopalatine fossa anatomical structures, ensuring the effectiveness and safety of the pterygopalatine blockade.

About the Authors

I. G. Oleshchenko
Irkutsk Branch of S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Med.), Anesthesiologist

Lermontova str. 337, Irkutsk 664033, Russian Federation 



D. V. Zabolotsky
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University 
Russian Federation

 Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Paediatrics named after Professor V.I. Gordeev

Litovskaya str. 2, Saint Petersburg 194100, Russian Federation 



V. A. Koriachkin
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University 
Russian Federation

 Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor at the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Paediatrics named after Professor V.I. Gordeev 

Litovskaya str. 2, Saint Petersburg 194100, Russian Federation 



V. V. Pogorelchuk
Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University 
Russian Federation

 Cand. Sc. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Paediatrics named after Professor V.I. Gordeev 

Litovskaya str. 2, Saint Petersburg 194100, Russian Federation 



References

1. Oleshchenko IG, Zabolotskii DV, Iureva TN, Zaika VA, Koriachkin VA. Postoperative anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery in children. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2020; 14(3): 156-163. (In Russ.).

2. Cozowicz C, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG. Trends in the use of regional anesthesia: Neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 41(1): 43-49. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000342

3. Golembiewski J, Dasta J. Evolving role of local anesthetics in managing postsurgical analgesia. Clin Ther. 2015; 37(6): 1354-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.017

4. Sng QW, He H-G, Wang W, Taylor B, Chow A, Klainin-Yobas P, et al. A meta-synthesis of children’s experiences of postoperative pain management. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017; 14: 46-54. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12185

5. Koriachkin VA, Zabolotsky DV. Place of regional blocks in surgical anesthesia. Medicine: Theory and Practice. 2018; 3(4): 65-69. (In Russ.).

6. Candido KD, Sukhani R, Doty Jr R, Nader A, Kendall MC, Yaghmour E, et al. Neurologic sequelae after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder/upper arm surgery: The association of patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors to the incidence and clinical course. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 1489-1495. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148696.11814.9F

7. Zabolotskiy DV, Ulrikh GE, Malashenko NS, Kulev AG. Ultrasound in anesthesiological practice – exclusive or routine? Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2012; 6(1): 5-10. (In Russ.).

8. Aizenberg VL, Ulrikh GE, Tsypin LE, Zabolotskiy DV. Selected chapters from monography “Regional anesthesia in pediatrics”. Continuous peripheral and central blocks in postoperative period. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2014; 8(4): 41-49. (In Russ.).

9. Beverly A, Kaye AD, Ljungqvist O, Urman RD. Essential elements of multimodal analgesia in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017; 35(2): e115-e143. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2017.01.018

10. Koryachkin VA, Chupris VG, Cherny AZh, Kazarin VS, Liskov MA, Malevich GM, et al. Systemic toxicity of local anesthetics during regional anesthesia in orthopedics and traumatology. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2015; 1(75): 129-135. (In Russ.).

11. Nadiradze ZZ, Mikhaylov AV, Zabolotskiy DV, Karetnikov IA. Conducting brachial plexus blockade under control of ultrasound imaging and neurostimulation. Acta biomedical scientifi ca. 2014; 3(97): 46-50. (In Russ.).

12. Markhofer P. Fundamentals of regional anesthesia with ultrasound navigation. Principles and practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. (In Russ.).

13. Sites BD, Brull R, Chan VW, Spence BC, Gallagher J, Beach ML, et al. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: Part II: A pictorial approach to understanding and avoidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35(Suppl 2): S81-S92. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d3535a

14. Koriachkin VA, Zabolotski DV, Kuzmin VV, Anisimov OG, Ezhevskaya AA, Zagrekov VI. Anesthesia for hip fracture surgery geriatric patients (clinical guidelines). Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2017; 11(2): 133-142. (In Russ.).

15. Oleshchenko I, Cok OY, Iureva T, Zabolotskii D, Kripak A. Effect of pterygopalatine blockade on perioperative stress and inflammatory outcomes following paediatric cataract surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020; 45(3): 204-208. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100823

16. Netter F. Atlas of human anatomy; 7th ed. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2011.

17. Narouze S. Topical intranasal lidocaine is not a sphenopalatine ganglion block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 46(3): 276-279. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102173

18. Yeğin Y, Çelik M, Altıntaş A, Şimşek BM, Olgun B, Kayhan FT. Vidian canal types and dehiscence of the bony roof of the canal: An anatomical study. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 55(1): 22-26. doi: 10.5152/tao.2017.2038

19. Degirmenci N, Ozdem A, Uysal H, Sen P, Senturk E, Ozturan O, et al. The effect of sphenopalatine ganglion block on the postoperative pain in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020; 129(7): 722-726. doi: 10.1177/0003489420909417

20. Marova NG, Vasilyev YaI, Klyushnikova EV, Kononov AV, Polyakova TS. Local anesthesia for vitreo-retinal surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2018; 12(1): 24-29. (In Russ.).

21. Mojica J, Mo B, Ng A. Sphenopalatine ganglion block in the management of chronic headaches. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2017; 21(6): 27. doi: 10.1007/s11916-017-0626-8

22. Nader A, Bendok BR, Prine JJ, Kendall MC. Ultrasoundguided pulsed radiofrequency application via the pterygopalatine fossa: A practical approach to treat refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Physician. 2015; 18(3): E411-E415.

23. Kampitak W, Tansatit T, Shibata Y. A cadaveric study of ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block via the pterygopala tine fossa: a novel technique using the lateral pterygoid plate approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 43: 625-630. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000790

24. Chiono J, Raux O, Bringuier S, Sola Ch, Bigorre M, Capdevila X, et al. Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block for cleft palate repair in children: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study versus placebo. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120(6): 1362-1369. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000171

25. Vadhanan P. Successful use of Gasserian ganglion block for maxillo-mandibular fixation in a patient with severe pulmonary dysfunction: A case report. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020; 20(5): 331-335. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.5.331

26. Alfaro-de la Torre P, Boada Pie S, Fajardo Perez M, González-Arnay E. Ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block via the pterygopalatine fossa: Anterior versus posterior infrazygomatic approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019: rapm-2018-100077. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100077

27. Bystrova MM. Morphological features of the maxillary artery structure in adults. Ukraїns’kiy medichniy al’manakh. 2011; 14(2): 27-29. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Oleshchenko I.G., Zabolotsky D.V., Koriachkin V.A., Pogorelchuk V.V. Ensuring the effectiveness and safety of peripheral blockades. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2021;6(6-1):105-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2021-6.6-1.12

Views: 716


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)