Historical aspects of the problem of surgical treatment of hemorrhagic stroke. The role of intracranial pressure in the choice of treatment tactics (review of literature)

This article provides a literature review of the past 60 years, conducted using keywords through the PubMed Internet resource, dedicated to the methods of surgical treatment of hemorrhagic stroke. The existing published results of clinical studies do not allow us to draw unambiguous conclusions about the superiority of conservative or neurosurgical treatment in relation to the functional recovery of patients. There is a statistical significance of the advantages of surgery based on the prevention of dislocation syndrome, control of intracranial hypertension, and prevention or at least reduction of the effect of blood and its degradation products on the surrounding healthy tissue. However, large randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate this benefit in terms of mortality or functional outcome.

There are two main areas of hemorrhagic stroke surgery – open surgery and minimally invasive methods. The practice of open surgery is associated with high trauma rates, as well as with certain risks and complications. However, craniotomy is a lifesaving measure in critical situations with signs of persistent increased intracranial pressure leading to neurological impairment. The ability to control intracranial pressure provides a chance for the choice of more optimal tactics of surgical treatment.

Today, the gold standard for intracranial pressure monitoring is the installation of invasive intraventricular or intraparenchymal transducers. The method is appreciated for its accuracy, however, there are a number of disadvantages in the form of the possibility of hemorrhagic and infectious complications, as well as the high cost of the sensor itself, which limits its routine use. The inability to measure intracranial pressure before surgery causes an unreasonable expansion of indications for choosing an open method of surgery, which reduces the possibility of a better functional outcome.

All of these points make it urgent to search for a non-invasive method for measuring intracranial pressure, which would contribute to the timely choice of a surgical method without the danger of worsening the clinical outcome. 

1. Krylov VV, Dashyan VG, Burov AS, Petrikov SS. Hemorrhagic stroke surgery. Moscow: Meditsina; 2012. (In Russ.).

2. Sacco S, Marini C, Toni D, Olivieri L, Carolei A. Incidence and 10-year survival of intracerebral hemorrhage in a population-based registry. Stroke. 2009; 40(2): 394-399. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523209

3. Babi MA, James ML. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: should we operate? Front Neurol. 2017; 8: 394. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00645

4. Mckissock W, Richardson A, Taylor J. Primary intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 1961; 278: 221-226.

5. Auer LM, Deinsberger W, Niederkorn K, Gell G, Kleinert R, Schneider G, et al. Endoscopic surgery versus medical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: A randomized study. J Neurosurg. 1989; 70(4): 530-535. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.4.0530

6. Juvela S, Heiskanen O, Poranen A, Valtonen S, Kuurne T, Kaste M, et al. The treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. A prospective randomized trial of surgical and conservative treatment. J Neurosurg. 1989; 70(5): 755-758. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.5.0755

7. Batjer HH, Reisch JS, Allen BC, Plaizier LJ, Su CJ. Failure of surgery to improve outcome in hypertensive putaminal hemorrhage. A prospective randomized trial. Arch Neurol. 1990; 47(10): 1103-1106. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530100071015

8. Morgenstern LB, Frankowski RF, Shedden P, Pasteur W, Grotta JC. Surgical treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage (STICH): A single-center, randomized clinical trial. Neurology. 1998; 51(5): 1359-1363. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.5.1359

9. Zuccarello M, Brott T, Derex L, Kothari R, Sauerbeck L, Tew J, et al. Early surgical treatment for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: A randomized feasibility study. Stroke. 1999; 30(9): 1833-1839. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.9.1833

10. Morgenstern LB, Demchuk AM, Kim DH, Frankowski RF, Grotta JC. Rebleeding leads to poor outcome in ultra-early craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2001; 56(10): 1294-1299. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.10.1294

11. Teernstra OPM, Evers SMAA, Lodder J, Leffers P, Franke CL, Blaauw G, et al. Stereotactic treatment of intracerebral hematoma by means of a plasminogen activator: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (SICHPA). Stroke. 2003; 34(4): 968-974. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000063367.52044.40

12. Hattori N, Katayama Y, Maya Y, Gatherer A. Impact of stereotactic hematoma evacuation on activities of daily living during the chronic period following spontaneous putaminal hemorrhage: A randomized study. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101(3): 417-420. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0417

13. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Hope DT, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the international surgical trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): A randomised trial. Lancet. 2005; 365(9457): 387-397. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X

14. Pantazis G, Tsitsopoulos P, Mihas C, Katsiva V, Stavrianos V, Zymaris S. Early surgical treatment vs conservative management for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematomas: A prospective randomized study. Surg Neurol. 2006; 66(5): 492-501; discussion 501-502. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.05.054

15. Kim YZ, Kim KH. Even in patients with a small hemorrhagic volume, stereotactic-guided evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage improves functional outcome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 46(2): 109-115. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.2.109

16. Wang W-Z, Jiang B, Liu H-M, Li D, Lu C-Z, Zhao Y-D, et al. Minimally invasive craniopuncture therapy vs. conservative treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Results from a randomized clinical trial in China. Int J Stroke. 2009; 4(1): 11-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00239.x

17. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, Murray GD, Gholkar A, Mitchell PM, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): A randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 382(9890): 397-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60986-1

18. Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Muschelli J, Rosenblum M, McBee N, Lane K, et al. Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE): A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15(12): 1228-1237. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30234-4

19. Vespa P, Hanley D, Betz J, Hoffer A, Engh J, Carter R, et al. ICES (intraoperative stereotactic computed tomographyguided endoscopic surgery) for brain hemorrhage: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2016; 47(11): 2749-2755. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013837

20. Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Rosenblum M, Yenokyan G, Lane K, McBee N, et al. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III): A randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019; 393(10175): 1021-1032. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30195-3

21. de Oliveira Manoe AL. Surgery for spontaneous intracerebral Hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 45. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2749-2

22. Rabinstein AA, Wijdicks EFM. Surgery for intracerebral hematoma: The search for the elusive right candidate. Rev Neurol Dis. 2006; 3(4): 163-172.

23. Flaherty ML, Beck J. Surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage: Moving forward or making circles? Stroke. 2013; 44(10): 2953-2954. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002533

24. Dashyan VG, Shesterikov YaA, Sytnik AV, Godkov IM, Tsilina SV, Elfimov AV, et al. Endoscopic surgery for hemorrhagic stroke in regional vascular centers. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019; 21(1): 35-44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1683-3295-2019-21-1-35-44

25. Krylov VV, Burov SA, Dashyan VG, Galankina IE. Local fibrinolysis in surgical treatment of non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhages. Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2013; (7): 24-31. (In Russ.).

26. Mould WA, Carhuapoma JR, Muschelli J, Lane K, Morgan TC, McBee NA, et al. Minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation decreases perihematomal edema. Stroke. 2013; 44(3): 627-634. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000411

27. Awad IA, Polster SP, Carrion-Penagos J, Thompson RE, Cao Y, Stadnik A, et al. Surgical performance determines functional outcome benefit in the minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for Intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) procedure. Neurosurgery. 2019; 84(6): 1157- 1168. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz077

28. Scaggiante J, Zhang X, Mocco J, Kellner CP. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018; 49(11): 2612-2620. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020688

29. Hallevi H, Albright KC, Aronowski J, Barreto AD, MartinSchild S, Khaja AM, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage: anatomic relationships and clinical implications. Neurology. 2008; 70(11): 848-852. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304930.47751.75

30. Hemphill JC, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, Becker K, Bendok BR, Cushman M, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015; 46(7): 2032-2060. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069

31. Hemphill JC, Lam A. Emergency neurological life support: Intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2017; 27(Suppl 1): 89- 101. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0453-0

32. Hanley DF, Lane K, McBee N, Ziai W, Tuhrim S, Lees KR, et al. Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial. Lancet. 2017; 389(10069): 603-611. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32410-2

33. Wang D, Liu J, Norton C, Liu M, Selim M. Local fibrinolytic therapy for intraventricular hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Neurosurg. 2017; 107: 1016-1024. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.135

34. Li Y, Zhang H, Wang X, She L, Yan Z, Zhang N, et al. Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e80599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080599

35. Kirollos RW, Tyagi AK, Ross SA, van Hille PT, Marks PV. Management of spontaneous cerebellar hematomas: a prospective treatment protocol. Neurosurgery. 2001; 49(6): 1378-1386; discussion 1386-1387. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200112000-00015

36. Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC, Tuhrim S. The ICH score: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage editorial comment: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001; 32(4): 891-897. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.4.891

37. Kobayashi S, Sato A, Kageyama Y, Nakamura H, Watanabe Y, Yamaura A. Treatment of hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage: Surgical or conservative management? Neurosurgery. 1994; 34(2): 246-250; discussion 250-251.

38. Da Pian R, Bazzan A, Pasqualin A. Surgical versus medical treatment of spontaneous posterior fossa haematomas: A cooperative study on 205 cases. Neurol Res. 1984; 6(3): 145-151. doi: 10.10 80/01616412.1984.11739680

39. Kuramatsu JB, Biffi A, Gerner ST, Sembill JA, Sprügel MI, Leasure A, et al. Association of Surgical Hematoma Evacuation vs conservative treatment with functional outcome in patients with cerebellar Intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA. 2019; 322(14): 1392- 1403. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13014

40. Krylov VV, Dashyan VG, Danilov VA, Godkov IM. Surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hematomas (clinical recommendations). Neurological Journal. 2016; 21(3): 146-151. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18821/1560-9545-2016-21-3-146-151

41. Fung C, Murek M, Z’Graggen WJ, Krähenbühl AK, Gautschi OP, Schucht P, et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012; 43(12): 3207-3211. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666537

42. Heuts SG, Bruce SS, Zacharia BE, Hickman ZL, Kellner CP, Sussman ES, et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy without clot evacuation in dominantsided intracerebral hemorrhage with ICP crisis. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 34(5): E4. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS1326

43. Hayes SB, Benveniste RJ, Morcos JJ, Aziz-Sultan MA, Elhammady MS. Retrospective comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for surgical evacuation of nontraumatic, supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 34(5): E3. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS12422

44. Raboel PH, Bartek J Jr, Andresen M, Bellander BM, Romner B. Intracranial pressure monitoring: Invasive versus noninvasive methods – A review. Crit Care Res Pract. 2012; 2012: 950393. doi: 10.1155/2012/950393