Analysis of the Degree of Involvement of the Lower Limb Muscles in the Pathological Process in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Background. The problem of the effect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on the functional condition of the lower limb muscles is still highlighted insufficiently.

Aim. Analysis of the degree of involvement of the lower limb muscles in the pathological process in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods. A comparative analysis has been made on the results of examination of 209 adolescents: 25 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis; 170 normal adolescents; 14 adolescents with congenital scoliosis. The moments of force ofthe lower limb muscles were evaluated using dynamometric stands. Electrophysiological characteristics of the lower limb muscles were registered by the method of global and stimulation electroneuromyography.

Results. The decrease in the amplitude of voluntary EMG of the femoral muscles in adolescents with idiopathic and congenital scoliosis is accompanied by dropping the moments of force relative to the values of the control group. The leg muscles are characterized by the preservation of the values of force at the level of normal test subjects under the conditions of the reduced voluntary EMG of high frequency. The amplitude of the M-responses of the indicator muscles and the values of the excitation propagation velocity along the motor fibers were also preserved. There are no statistically significant correlations between the amount of the spine deformity, on the one hand, and the values of asymmetry of the characteristics of the muscles in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Conclusion. In adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis the function of femoral muscles is decreased, and there is no relationship between the amount of the spine deformity and the values of asymmetry of the characteristics of the lower limb muscles. The similar character of muscle function changes in adolescents with idiopathic and congenital scoliosis can testify that the cause of the observed changes is not the disease etiology, but the insufficient level of motor activity. 

1. Negrini S, Donzelli S., Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D. Schreiber S., Claude de Mauroy J, et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018; 13: 3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8

2. Kuznia AL, Hernandez AK, Lee LU. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Common questions and answers. Am Fam Physician. 2020; 101(1): 19-23.

3. Trobisch P, Suess O, Schwab F. Idiopathic scoliosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010; 107(49): 875-884. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0875

4. Stuart L, Weinstein MD. The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Orthop. 2019; 39(6): S44-S46. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001350

5. Yagci G, Yakut Y, Simsek E. The effects of exercise on perception of verticality in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018; 34(8): 579-588. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017 .1423429

6. Fabry G. Clinical practice: the spine from birth to adolescence. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168(12): 1415-1420. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-0998-9

7. de Seze M, Cugy E. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: A review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 55(2): 128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2012.01.003

8. Chwała W, Koziana A, Kasperczyk T, Walaszek R, Płaszewski M. Electromyographic assessment of functional symmetry of paraspinal muscles during static exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 573276. doi: 10.1155/2014/573276

9. Yaman O, Dalbayrak S. Idiopathic scoliosis. Turk Neurosurg. 2014; 24: 646–657. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8838-13.0

10. Latalski M, Danielewicz-Bromberek A, Fatyga M, Latalska M, Krоber M, Zwolak P. Current insights into the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017; 137: 1327-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2756-1

11. Paz ACD, Brandao ICS, Silveira EBD, Gomes CR. Morphological and morphometric analysis of paraspinal and intercostal musculature on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spine. 2015; 4: 206. doi: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000206

12. Wajchenberg M, Astur N, Kanas M, Martins DE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Current concepts on neurological and muscular etiologies. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016; 11: 4. doi: 10.1186/s13013-016-0066-y

13. Dolganova TI, Dolganov DV, Riabykh SO. Diagnostic information value of EMG envelope algorithm for superficial paraspinal muscles in postural stereotypes of patients with scoliosis grades III and IV. Genij Ortopedii. 2018; 24(1): 57-63. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2018-24-1-57-63. (In Russ.)

14. Herman R, Mixon J, Fisher A, Maulucci R, Stuyck J. Idiopathic scoliosis and the central nervous system: A motor control problem. The Harrington lecture, 1983. Scoliosis research society. Spine. 1985; 10(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198501000-00001

15. Domenech J, García-Martí G, Martí-Bonmatí L, Barrios C, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A. Abnormal activation of the motor cortical network in idiopathic scoliosis demonstrated by functional MRI. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(7): 1069-1078. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1776-8

16. Yekutiel M, Robin GC, Yarom R. Proprioceptive function in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1981; 6(6): 560-566. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198111000-00006

17. Pingot M, Czernicki J, Kubacki J. Assessment of muscle strength of hip joints in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007; 9(6): 636-643.

18. Lédio Alves DP, Araújo B. Muscle disorders in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Literature review. Coluna/Columna. 2016; 15(1): 73-77. doi: 10.1590/S1808-185120161501151839

19. Lin JJ, Chen WH, Chen PQ, Tsauo JY. Alteration in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2010; 35(11): 1151-1157. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd5923

20. Zabjek KF, Leroux MA, Coillard C, Prince F, Rivard CH. Postural characteristics of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008; 28(2): 218-224. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181651bdc

21. WHO Health of mothers, newborns, children and adolescents. Adolescent development. URL: https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/adolescence/dev/ru/ (In Russ.)

22. Shchurov VA, Dolganova TI, Dolganov DV. Femoral muscle dynamometer. Biomedical Engineering. 2014; 48(1): 30-32. doi: 10.1007/s10527-014-9410-9

23. Shchurov VA, Dolganova TI, Dolganov DV. Device for measuring lower leg muscle strength. Biomedical Engineering. 2016; 50(2): 124-127. doi: 10.1007/s10527-016-9602-6

24. Shein AP, Krivoruchko GA, Ryabykh SO. Reactivity and resistance of the spinal structures during instrumental correction of spinal deformities. Russian Journal of Physiology. 2016; 102(12): 1495-1506. (In Russ.)

25. Shein AP, Sajfutdinov MS, Krivoruchko GA. Local and systemic responses of sensorimotor structures to limb elongation and ischemia. Kurgan: DAMMI; 2006. (In Russ.)

26. Szwed A, Kołban M, Jałoszewski M. Results of SpineCor dynamic bracing for idiopathic scoliosis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2009; 11(5): 427-432.

27. Nikolaev VF, Baranovskaya IA, Andrievskaya AO. Results of using a functional corrective Cheneau type brace in complex rehabilitation of children and teenagers with idiopathic scoliosis. Genij Ortopedii. 2019; 25(3): 368-377. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-3-368-377. (In Russ.)

28. Pinchuk D, Dudin M, Bekshayey S, Pinchuk O. Peculiarities of brain functioning in children with adolescence idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to EEG studies. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2012; 176: 87-90.

29. Wang D, Shi L, Chu WCW, Burwell RG, Cheng JCY, Ahuja AT. Abnormal cerebral cortical thinning pattern in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis. NeuroImage. 2012; 59(2): 935-942. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.097

30. Sahgal V, Shah A, Flanagan N, Schaffer M, Kane W, Subramani V, et al. Morphologic and morphometric studies of muscle in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983; 54: 242-251. doi: 10.3109/17453678308996564

31. Wajchenberg M, Martins DE, Luciano R de P, Puertas EB, Del Curto D, Schmidt B, et al. Histochemical analysis of paraspinal rotator muscles from patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2015; 94(8): e598. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000598

32. Dudin MG, Pinchuk DYu. Idiopathic scoliosis: diagnosis, pathogenesis. St. Petersburg: Chelovek; 2009. (In Russ.)

33. Sharma S, Londono D, Eckalbar WL, Gao X, Zhang D, Mauldin K, et al. A PAX1 enhancer locus is associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis in females. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 6452. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7452

34. Zhu Z, Tang NL, Xu L, Qin X, Mao S, Song Y, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese girls. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 8355. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9355

35. Lupandina-Bolotova GS, Taybulatov NI, Ignatov DA, Namazova-Baranova LS, Polyakov SD, Perevozchikova YP. Functional disorders in the spine deformations and methods for their correction. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii – Current Pediatrics. 2015; 14(2): 201-206. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14i2.1287. (In Russ.)

36. Yarom R, Robin GC. Muscle pathology in idiopathic scoliosis. Isr J Med Sci. 1979; 15: 917-924.

37. Luciano RdP, Puertas EB, Martins DE, Faloppa F, Del Curto D, Reis LM, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis without limb weakness: A differential diagnosis of core myo-pathy? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16: 179. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0629-8

38. Shchurova EN, Sajfutdinov MS, Dolganova TI, Ahmedova MA. Study of sensory system features of children and adolescents with congenital scoliosis. Sovremennye problemy nauki I obrazovaniya. 2020; 5. doi: 10.17513/spno.30164. (In Russ.)

39. Sampiev MT, Laka AA, Zagorodnij NV. Scoliosis. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2008. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2018-24-3-365-374. (In Russ.)