Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Microbiological diagnostics of pyoinflammatory abdominal diseases

https://doi.org/10.12737/22976

Abstract

The aim of the work was to establish the significance of complex bacteriological research in the diagnostics of acute appendicitis and to determine an optimal material for the research based on the findings. We examined 19 patients with acute phlegmonous or acute gangrenous appendicitis (males, aged 18-60 years). We performed bacteriological research of abdominal exudate (n = 19) and biopsy specimen (n = l9) of appendix wall taken before opening the lumen of the intestine. Both abdominal exudate and appendix wall specimen were taken at the same time. Aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms were detected and identified, antimicrobial susceptibility was tested. In total, we detected 25 strains of aerobic and 13 strains of anaerobic microorganisms. It has been established that a bioptate was most informative for testing (68.4 %); the parallel study of an abdominal exudate gave positive results in 21.1 % of cases. In the structure of clinically significant microflora dominated E. coli (43.3 %), then went nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria (13.3 %) and Bacteroides spp. (16.7 %). We marked growing resistance of detected strains of gram-negative bacteria to some antibiotics. For instance, 62 % of detected E. coli strains were resistant to ampicillin, 25 % - to ciprofloxacin. 92 % of strains were resistant to cefepime, 93 % -to ceftriaxone, 77 % - to Amoxiclav, 67 % - to gentamicin, 90 % - to tobramycin. From one bioptate a strain of E. coli ESBL was separated. The study of intraoperative bioptate of appendix wall increases effectiveness of microbiological diagnostics in comparison with the abdominal exudate research.

About the Authors

T. V. Fadeeva
Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation


I. A. Shurygina
Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology;Irkutsk Scientific Center SB RAS
Russian Federation


M. G. Shurygin
Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology;Irkutsk Scientific Center SB RAS
Russian Federation


A. V. Vetokhina
Irkutsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


L. M. Vladimirova
Irkutsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


N. I. Ayushinova
Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation


A. I. Panasyuk
Irkutsk Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation


References

1. Абдоминальная хирургическая инфекция (классификация, диагностика, антимикробная терапия): Российские национальные рекомендации / Под ред. В.С. Савельева, Б.Р. Гельфанда. - М.: ООО «Компания БОРГЕС», 2011. - 99 с

2. Волков А.Г., Заривчацкий М.Ф. Микробный пейзаж абдоминальных хирургических инфекций у больных многопрофильного стационара // Пермский медицинский журнал. - 2014. - Т. 31, № 1. - С. 53-57

3. Гостищев В.К. Инфекции в хирургии. - М.: ГЭ-ОТАР-медиа, 2007. - 761 с

4. Кригер Д.Г., Фёдоров А.В., Воскресенский П.К., Дронов А.Ф. Острый аппендицит. - М.: Медпрактика, 2002. - 244 с

5. Сковлев С.В. Абдоминальные инфекции: значение анаэробной микрофлоры в обосновании режимов эмпирической абдоминальной терапии // РМЖ. -2006. - Т. 14, № 15. - С. 1066-1068

6. Фадеева Т.В., Садах М.В., Верещагина С.А., Григорьев Е.Г. Данные микробиологического мониторинга и антибактериальной терапии инфицированного панкреонекроза // Инфекции в хирургии. - 2010. -№ 3. - С. 17-23

7. Фадеева Т.В., Верещагина С.А., Филатова Л.С., Садах М.В., Григорьев Е.Г. Микробиологическая оценка послеоперационной раневой инфекции в многопрофильной хирургической клинике // Инфекции в хирургии. - 2012. - № 4. - С. 14-20

8. Шатобалов В.К. Аппендицит: этиология, патогенез, классификация, а также варианты его рецидивирующего и хронического течения // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. - 2013. - № 4. - С. 87-91

9. Aldridge KE, O’Brien M (2002). In vitro susceptibilities of the Bacteroides fragilis group species: change in isolation rates significantly affects overall susceptibility data. J. Clin. Microbiol., (40), 4349-4352.

10. Brook I, Frazier EH (2000). Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology in intra-abdominal infections associated with diverticulitis. J. Med. Microbiol., (49), 827-830.

11. Bratzler DW, Hunt DR (2006). The surgical infection prevention and surgicalcare improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes forpatients having surgery. Clin. Infect. Dis., (43), 322-330.

12. Gladman MA, Knowles CH, Gladman LJ, Payne JG (2004). Intra-operative culture in appendicitis: traditional practice challenged. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, (86), 196-201.

13. Maltezou HC, Nikolaidis P, Lebesii E, Dimitriou L, Androulakakis E, Kafetzis DA (2001). Piperacillin/ tazobactam versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole for treatment of children with intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., (20), 643-646.

14. Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, O’Neill PJ, Chow AW, Dellinger EP, Eachempati SR, Gorbach S, Hilfiker M, May AK, Nathens AB, Sawyer RG, Bartlett JG (2010). Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Surg. Infect., (11), 79-109.

15. Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, Rex L, Badume I, Granström L (2006). Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J. Surg., (30), 1033-1037.


Review

For citations:


Fadeeva T.V., Shurygina I.A., Shurygin M.G., Vetokhina A.V., Vladimirova L.M., Ayushinova N.I., Panasyuk A.I. Microbiological diagnostics of pyoinflammatory abdominal diseases. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2016;1(4):95-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/22976

Views: 998


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)