Assessment of the risk of cardiovascular complications in cancer surgery
https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2023-8.3.20
Abstract
Cardiac complications of non-cardiac surgeries are an actual and unresolved interdisciplinary problem of clinical medicine today. The incidence of cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery is higher than in the general population and does not tend to decrease. The risk of cardiac complications in cancer surgery is the highest. Evidence-based approaches to risk assessment and prevention of cardiovascular events in surgical patients with malignant neoplasms have not been developed. In current clinical guidelines on the prevention, prognosis and treatment of cardiac complications of non-cardiac surgeries, the aspects of this problem in surgical oncology are not considered separately.
The aim of this review was to analyze the current sources of literature on the prediction of cardiovascular complications in surgical treatment of cancer patients. The distinctive features of cancer surgery and additional factors causing an increased risk of adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with malignant neoplasms are described. The article presents the results of large cohort studies on the search for reliable predictors of cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery and on the development of stratification scales and algorithms for preoperative risk assessment. Particular attention is paid to the possibilities and prospects of using these predictive tools in the surgical treatment of cancer. The surgical risks of interventions for malignant neoplasms are described, as well as methods for calculating cardiac risk and functional status assessment that have been validated in oncological patients cohorts. The data of recent studies on the role of serum biomarkers of myocardial damage and increased cardiovascular risk (cardiac troponins and brain natriuretic peptide) in predicting postoperative cardiac events in non-cardiac surgery are presented. Further prospects for the inclusion of biomarkers in risk stratification systems in patients with malignant neoplasms are discussed.
About the Authors
K. V. ProtasovRussian Federation
Konstantin V. Protasov – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Cardiology and Functional Diagnostics
Yubileyniy 100, Irkutsk 664049, Russian Federation
O. A. Barakhtenko
Russian Federation
Olga A. Barakhtenko – General Physician at the Thoracic Surgery Department
Frunze str. 32, Irkutsk 664035, Russian Federation
References
1. Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan M, Villar J, Xavier D, Srinathan S, et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: A large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120(3): 564-578. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000113
2. Smilowitz N, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, Guo Y, Berger J, Bangalore S. Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with noncardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2(2): 181-187. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4792
3. Smilowitz N, Gupta N, Guo Y, Berger J, Bangalore S. Perioperative acute myocardial infarction associated with non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(31): 2409-2417. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx313
4. Devereaux P, Sessler D. Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 2258-2269. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1502824
5. Ferguson M, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Mitchell J, Varela G, Brunelli A. Prediction of major cardiovascular events after lung resection using a modified scoring system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97(4): 1135-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.032
6. Davydov MI, Akchurin RS, Gerasimov SS, Brand IaB, Dolgov IM. The surgical treatment of patients with lung cancer and severe cardiovascular disorders. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2012; (7): 18-26. (In Russ.).
7. Navi B, Reiner A, Kamel H, Iadecola C, Okin P, Elkind M, et al. Risk of arterial thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70(8): 926-938. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.047
8. Sarkar R, Hatamipour A, Panjwani N, Courtney P, Cherry D, Salans MA, et al. Impact of radiation on cardiovascular outcomes in older resectable esophageal cancer patients with medicare. Am J Clin Oncol. 2021; 44(6): 275-282. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000815
9. Zhang W, Xie K, Fu S, Jiang H, Fang M, Lian Y, et al. Comparison of the incidence of perioperative cardiovascular risk events among patients with and without a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019; 85(8): 822-829. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13388-3
10. Koene R, Prizment A, Blaes A, Konety S. Shared risk factors in cardiovascular disease and cancer. Circulation. 2016; 133(11): 1104-1114. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020406
11. Sumin AN, Starovojtova AV, Scheglova AV, Gorbunova EV. Role of preoperative cardiology consultation in patients undergoing cancer surgery. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2020; 92(1): 25-29. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/00403660.2020.01.000478
12. Bilimoria K, Liu Y, Paruch J, Zhou L, Kmiecik T, Ko C, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: A decision aide and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217(5): 833-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385
13. Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation – A scoping review. Healthcare (Basel). 2016; 4(3): 36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030036
14. McIsaac D, Montroy J, Gagne S, Johnson C, Ernst J, Halman S, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for perioperative risk assessment and management: An interrupted time series study. Can J Anaesth. 2021; 68(8): 1135-1145. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02026-x
15. Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Hall TS, Abdelhamid M, Barbato E, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2022: ehac270. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270
16. Fleisher L, Fleischmann K, Auerbach A, Barnason S, Beckman J, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(22): e77-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.944
17. Duceppe E, Parlow J, MacDonald P, Lyons K, McMullen M, Srinathan S, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management for patients who undergo noncardiac surgery. Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33(1): 17-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.09.008
18. Gerent A, Almeida J, Fominskiy E, Landoni G, de Oliveira G, Rizk S, et al. Effect of postoperative goal-directed therapy in cancer patients undergoing high-risk surgery: A randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1): 133. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2055-4
19. Papadopoulou A, Mathers E. Risk stratification of the cancer patient: A narrative review. Dig Med Res. 2020; 3: 27. doi: 10.21037/dmr-2
20. Bolshedvorskaya OA, Protasov KV, Batoroev YuK, Ulybin PS, Dvornichenko VV. Postoperative cardiac ischemic complications in lung cancer patients. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2019; 4(5): 91-97. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.5.15
21. Hanley C, Donahoe L, Slinger P. Fit for surgery? What’s new in preoperative assessment of the high-risk patient undergoing pulmonary resection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021; 35(12): 3760-3773. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.025
22. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta M, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: Three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: The TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(2): 232-236. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171
23. Lee T, Marcantonio E, Mangione C, Thomas E, Polanczyk C, Cook E, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100(10): 1043-1049. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1043
24. Wotton R, Marshall A, Kerr A, Bishay E, Kalkat M, Rajesh P, et al. Does the revised cardiac risk index predict cardiac complications following elective lung resection? J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 8: 220. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-220
25. Bolshedvorskaya OA, Protasov KV, Ulybin PS, Dvornichenko VV. Postoperative myocardial infarction in lung cancer patients with: incidence rate, clinical features, prognostic factors. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 25(11): 44-50. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3946
26. Bolshedvorskaya OA, Protasov KV, Batunova EV, Semenova EN. Biomarkers of myocardial injury in surgical treatment of lung cancer: perioperative dynamics and prognostic value. Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2022; 11(2): 27-38. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-2-27-38
27. Gupta P, Gupta H, Sundaram A, Kaushik M, Fang X, Miller W, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011; 124(4): 381-387. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015701
28. Rivard C, Nahum R, Slagle E, Duininck M, Isaksson Vogel R, Teoh D. Evaluation of he performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 141: 281-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.015
29. Armstrong E, Beal E, Lopez-Aguiar A, Poultsides G, Cannon J, Rocha F, et al. Evaluating the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator in primary GI neuroendocrine tumor: Results from the United States neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group. Am Surg. 2019; 85: 1334-1340.
30. Liu J, Weber S, Berian J, Chen S, Cohen M, Ko C, et al. Role of operative complexity variables in risk adjustment for patients with cancer. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151: 1084-1086. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2253
31. Brunelli A, Salati M, Rocco G, Varela G, Van Raemdonck D, Decaluwe H, et al. European risk models for morbidity (EuroLung1) and mortality (EuroLung2) to predict outcome following anatomic lung resections: An analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 51(3): 490-497. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw319
32. Brunelli A, Cicconi S, Decaluwe H, Szanto Z, Falcoz P. Parsimonious Eurolung risk models to predict cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality following anatomic lung resections: An updated analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 57(3): 455-461. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz272
33. Taylor M, Szafron B, Martin G, Abah U, Smith M, Shackcloth M, et al. External validation of six existing multivariable clinical prediction models for short-term mortality in patients undergoing lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 59(5): 1030-1036. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa422
34. Brunelli A, Varela G, Salati M, Jimenez M, Pompili C, Novoa N, et al. Recalibration of the revised cardiac risk index in lung resection candidates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 90(1): 199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.042
35. Brunelli A, Cassivi S, Fibla J, Halgren L, Wigle D, Allen M, et al. External validation of the recalibrated thoracic revised cardiac risk index for predicting the risk of major cardiac complications after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92: 445-448. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.095
36. Ferguson M, Celauro A, Vigneswaran W. Validation of a modified scoring system for cardiovascular risk associated with major lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 41(3): 598-602. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr081
37. Brunelli A, Ferguson M, Salati M, Vigneswaran W, Jimenez M, Varela G. Thoracic revised cardiac risk index is associated with prognosis after resection for stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100(1): 195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.103
38. Salati M, Brunelli A. Risk stratification in lung resection. Curr Surg Rep. 2016; 4(11): 37. doi: 10.1007/s40137-016-0158-x
39. Brunelli A, Kim A, Berger K, Addrizzo-Harris D. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer. American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines; 3rd ed. Chest. 2013; 143(Suppl 5): e166S-e190S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2395
40. Duceppe E, Patel A, Chan M, Berwanger O, Ackland G, Kavsak P, et al. Preoperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172: 96-104. doi: 10.7326/M19-2501
41. Smilowitz N, Redel-Traub G, Hausvater A, Armanious A, Nicholson J, Puelacher C, et al. Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol Rev. 2019; 27(6): 267-273. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000254
42. Hou Y, Zhou Y, Hussain M, Budd G, Tang W, Abraham J, et al. Cardiac risk stratification in cancer patients: A longitudinal patient-patient network analysis. PLoS Med. 2021; 18(8): e1003736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003736
43. Шестопалова И.М., Герасимов С.С., Кадагидзе З.Г., Шелепова В.М. Применение маркера NT-proBNP в мониторинге периоперационной сердечной недостаточности у онкологических больных, страдающих ишемической болезнью сердца. Журнал сердечная недостаточность. 2008; 4(48): 172-174.
44. Vernooij L, van Klei W, Moons K, Takada T, van Waes J, Damen J. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 12(12): CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2
45. Deana C, Vetrugno L, Bignami E, Bassi F. Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: A narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint. J Thorac Dis. 2021; 13(10): 6037-6051. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-940
46. Patel N, Powell A, Wheat J, Brown C, Appadurai I, Davies R, et al. Cardiopulmonary fitness predicts postoperative major morbidity after esophagectomy for patients with cancer. Physiol Rep. 2019; 7: e14174. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14174
47. Lee C, Kong J, Ismail H, Riedel B, Heriot A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of objective assessment of physical fitness in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61(3): 400-409. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001017
48. Kumar R, Garcea G. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in hepato-biliary & pancreas cancer surgery – A systematic review: Are we any further than walking up a flight of stairs? Int J Surg. 2018; 52: 201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.019
49. Wijeysundera D, Pearse R, Shulman M, Abbott T, Torres E, Ambosta A, et al. Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: An international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018; 391: 2631-2640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31131-0
50. Colson M, Baglin J, Bolsin S, Grocott M. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts 5 yr survival after major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109: 735-741. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes263
51. Brunelli A, Belardinelli R, Pompili C, Xiumé F, Refai M, Salati M, et al. Minute ventilation-to-carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2) slope is the strongest predictor of respiratory complications and death after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93: 1802-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.022
52. Brunelli A, Pompili C, Salati M, Refai M, Berardi R, Mazzanti P, et al. Preoperative maximum oxygen consumption is associated with prognosis after pulmonary resection in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98(1): 238-242. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.029
53. Teh E, Sinha S, Joshi N, Kamalanathan K, Molyneux M, Rasburn N, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the prediction of perioperative events in patients undergoing lung resection in the modern era: A comparison of clinical, CPET and combined assessment. J Clin Anesth. 2020; 62: 109749. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109749
54. Brunelli A, Refai M, Xiume F, Salati M, Sciarra V, Socci L, et al. Performance at symptom-limited stair-climbing test is associated with increased cardiopulmonary complications, mortality, and costs after major lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86(1): 240-247. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.025
55. Wesolowski S, Orlowski T, Kram M. The 6-min walk test in the functional evaluation of patients with lung cancer qualified for lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020; 30(4): 559-564. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz313
56. Marjanski T, Badocha M, Wnuk D, Dziedzic R, Ostrowski M, Sawicka W, et al. Result of the 6-min walk test is an independent prognostic factor of surgically treated non-small-cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019; 28: 368-374. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy258
57. Fennelly J, Potter L, Pompili C, Brunelli A. Performance in the shuttle walk test is associated with cardiopulmonary complications after lung resections. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9(3): 789-795. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.22
58. Nutt C, Russell J. Use of the pre-operative shuttle walk test to predict morbidity and mortality after elective major colorectal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67(8): 839-849. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07194.x
59. Liu D, Wen H, He J, Gao S, Li S, Liu L, et al. Society for Translational Medicine Expert Consensus on the preoperative assessment of circulatory and cardiac functions and criteria for the assessment of risk factors in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(9): 5545-5549. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.91
Review
For citations:
Protasov K.V., Barakhtenko O.A. Assessment of the risk of cardiovascular complications in cancer surgery. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2023;8(3):179-189. https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2023-8.3.20