The results of surgical treatment of sacral schwannomas with extension into pelvic cavity

The aim. To analyze the results of surgical treatment of sacral schwannomas with their extension into lower pelvis.

Materials and methods. We analyzed the clinical results of surgical treatment of 25 patients with sacral schwannomas, including those with ventral extension and growth into pelvic cavity. All patients were operated at the Clinic of Neurosurgery of the Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Ya.L. Tsivyan for a 10-year period. The analysis of literature describing prevalence, classification, diagnosis and surgical treatment of sacral tumors and schwannomas in particular was carried out. The features of the course, diagnosis and surgical treatment of sacral schwannomas and accepted surgical methods for their treatment are described.

Results. The average follow-up period of the patients in our study was 61.6 ± 2 months. Compared with the initial indicators of patients in the postoperative period (1 year after the surgery), a good clinical result with the regression of symptoms was registered in 17 (68 %) out of 25 patients, and 10 (40 %) of them had a significant regression of neurological disorders. 3 (12 %) operated patients had a deterioration of neurological disorders in the form of aggravation of sensitive disorders; one patient had an aggravation of pelvic organ dysfunction. Radical removal of the tumor was achieved in 24 (96 %) out of 25 cases; subtotal resection was performed in 1 (4 %) patient. The number of relapses and continued growth of tumors in our series was 12 % (3 out of 25 patients). The mortality rate was 0 %. The complications were registered in 3 (12 %) cases and manifested as wound liquorrhea in cases of using posterior approach.

Conclusion. The degree of radicality of tumor resection and clinical outcomes is directly related to the selected surgical approach.

1. Stepanova YA, Grishankov SA, Karelskaya NA, Kalinin DV, Glotov AV. Retroperitoneal schwannoma (clinical case). Journal of Clinical Practice. 2016; 2: 58-66. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/clinpract7258-66

2. Handa K, Ozawa H, Aizawa T, Hashimoto K, Kanno H, Tateda S, et al. Surgical management of giant sacral schwannoma: A case series and literature review.world Neurosurg. 2019; 129: e216-e223. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.113

3. Vasilyev IA, Stupak VV, Tsvetovsky SB, Pendyurin IV, Selyakova MS, Voronina EI, et al. Late recurrence of spinal neurinoma after its single-stage total removal. Spine Surgery. 2018; 15(3): 100105. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14531/ss2018.3.100-105

4. Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Management of benign retroperitoneal schwannomas: A single-center experience. Am J Surg. 2011; 202(2): 194-198. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.036

5. Ragurajaprakash K, Hanakita J, Takahashi T, Ueno M, Minami M, Tomita Y, et al. Giant invasive sacral schwannoma with aortic bifurcation compression and hydronephrosis. World Neurosurg. 2020; 135: 267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.088

6. Attiah MA, Syre PP, Pierce J, Belyaeva E, Welch WC. Giant cystic sacral schwannoma mimicking tarlov cyst: A case report. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(S1): S84-S88. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4128-2

7. Wang J, Li D, Yang R, Tang X, Yan T, Guo W. Epidemiological characteristics of 1385 primary sacral tumors in one institution in China. World J Surg Oncol. 2020; 18(1): 297. doi: 10.1186/s12957020-02045-w

8. Stephens M, Gunasekaran A, Elswick C, Laryea JA, Pait TG, Kazemi N. Neurosurgical management of sacral tumors: Review of the literature and operative nuances. World Neurosurg. 2018; 116: 362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.212

9. Kalagi D, Bakir M, Alfarra M, Aborayya A, Anwar I. Two unusual presentations of presacral schwannoma: A case series. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019; 61: 165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.07.042

10. Konovalov NA, Asiutin DS, Korolishin VA, Kaprovoi SV, Timonin SIu, Martynova MA, et al. Management of neurogenic tumors of the sacrum and sacral area. Zhurnal Voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N.N. Burdenko. 2018; 6: 53-58. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/neiro20188206153

11. Feigl GC, Jugovic D, Staribacher D, Buslei R, Kuzmin D. Total resection of presacral giant schwannoma via minimally invasive dorsal approach: Illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2021; 2(15): CASE21319. doi: 10.3171/CASE21319

12. Khan UA, Ismayl G, Malik I. Giant sacral schwannoma treated with a 360 approach: A rare case and systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2018; 115: 65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.203

13. Zhou H, Zhou Z, Liang J, Wang Zh, Zhang X, Hu J, et al. Clinical analysis of 53 cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma. Сhin J Оncol. 2014; 36(11): 867-870.

14. Cagli S, Isik HS, Yildirim U, Akinturk N, Zileli M. Giant sacral schwannomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 2012; 110: 105-110. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0941-1

15. Braley AE, Goulart C, Chou J, Galgano M. Resection of a large presacral schwannoma from an all-posterior transsacral approach. Surg Neurol Int. 2020; 11: 408. doi: 10.25259/sNI_681_2020

16. Zhang J, Guo W, Yang Y, Wei R. Surgical treatment of giant benign sacral neurogenic tumors using the posterior-only approach. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019; 185: 105483. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105483

17. Nishizawa K, Mori K, Saruhashi Y, Takahashi Sh, Matsusue Y. Long-term clinical outcome of sacral chondrosarcoma treated by total en bloc sacrectomy and reconstruction of lumbosacral and pelvic ring using intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated autologous tumor-bearing sacrum: A case report with 10 years followup. Spine J. 2014; 14(5): e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.057

18. Kim JY, Lee G-J, Lee S-K, Moon BJ, Kang TW, Lee J-K. Giant sacral schwannoma: A case report. Chonnam Med J. 2020; 56(1): 85-86. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.1.85