Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Global social transformations in the context of demographic change and urbanization

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2022-7.3.6

Abstract

The article, from the standpoint of sociological analysis, examines fundamental changes in the structure of society, the distribution of resources that go beyond the framework of constant processes. Global social transformations reflect deeper forms of change at the level of value systems and power structures. The author of the article considers the most noticeable forms of changes at the level of social roles, institutions, status hierarchies, reflecting deep changes. The article deals with the term “transformation” from the standpoint of a deep, fundamental process of structural changes, fundamentally different from the previous one. New changes in the global social reality are taking place under the influence of the coronavirus pandemic, challenges and threats that have penetrated into all spheres of human life. An analysis is made of the “stopping” of the diverse global world, which had been changing so rapidly and it was impossible to imagine that all countries, regardless of the level of development, disagreements, struggle, would be absorbed by only one thing – obscurity, alienation, closeness. Questions are raised, world politics has changed due to the processes that fill its content, but how has it changed at the conceptual level, have modern transformations had a profound impact on the structure and geographical distribution of the population? If the growth of the role of nation-states is claimed, then how has the role of supranational institutions been transformed? What place does urbanization occupy in the processes of demographic changes associated with modern transformations? Is it fair to say that the urbanization of rural space is challenging conventional wisdom about what “rural” really means and what is still “rural” in many non-urban areas in wealthy societies?

About the Author

N. L. Smakotina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

 Dr. Sc. (Soc.), Head of the Department of Global Social Studies and Youth Studies

 (Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation 



References

1. Žižek S. Gap structure. The parallax view. Moscow: Evropa; 2008. (In Russ.).

2. Baluev DG. The changing role of the state in the context of modern global changes. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2003; 1: 160-175. (In Russ.).

3. Beyond modern society: emerging trends. URL: https://toolkit.pe2020.eu/resource/beyond-modern-society-emerging-trendsb2-2 [date of access: 01.12.2020].

4. Malinovsky PV. Globalization as a civilizational process. Russia and Contemporary World. 2001; 2(31): 5-30. (In Russ.).

5. Barlybaev Kh.A. Selected works. Volume II. Philosophical anthropology, globalization, sustainable development, consciousness and identity. Moscow: Nauchnaya biblioteka; 2014. (In Russ.).

6. Egorenkova MA . Conceptualization of the concept “global governance”. Political Science Issue. 2019; 10(50): 2203-2210. (In Russ.). doi: 10.35775/PSI.2019.50.10.014

7. Zopag.Com: Domain DB profile: Climate change. URL: http://www.climatechange.carboncapturereport.org [date of access: 01.12.2021].

8. Biscop S. Coronavirus and power: The impact on international politics. Security policy brief. 2020; 126.

9. Lavrov announced a sharp increase in the role of nation-states in a pandemic. URL: https://tass.ru/politika/8335025 [date of access: 01.12.2021]. (In Russ.).

10. Academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the global economy during the crisis. Scientific Russia. 29.03.2020. URL: https://scientificrussia.ru/articles/rossijskiespetsialisty-ob-ekonomicheskih-aspektah-pandemii [date of access: 01.12.2020]. (In Russ.).

11. Campbell KM, Doshi R. The Coronavirus could reshape global order. Foreign Affairs. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-03-18/coronavirus-couldreshape-global-order [date of access: 01.12.2020].

12. Hirschman A. Social conflicts as pillars of democratic market society. Political Theory. 1994. 22(2): 203-218.

13. Kirk D. Demographic transition theory. Popul Stud. 1996; 50(3): 361-387.

14. Fox SR. Urbanization as a global historical process: Theory and evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Dev Rev. 2012; 38(2): 285-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00493.x

15. Annez PC, Buckley RM. Chapter 1. Urbanization and growth: Setting the context. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238730510_CHAPTER_1_Urbanization_and_Growth_Setting_the_Context [date of access: 22.10.2021].

16. Lasuen JR. Urbanisation and development of the temporal interaction between geographical and sectoral clusters. Urban Stud. 1973; 10(2): 163-188.

17. Feldman M, Florida R. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 1994; 84(2): 210-229.

18. Florida R. Cities and the creative class. City Community. 2003; 2: 13-19. doi: 10.1111/1540-6040.00034

19. Jacobs J. The death & life of great American cities. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.; 1984.

20. Skeldon R. The evolution of migration patterns during urbanization in Peru. Geogr Rev. 1977; 67(4): 394-411.

21. Zelinsky W. The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geogr Rev. 1971; 61(2): 219-249.

22. Berriane M. Emigration internationale du travail et mircourbanisation dans le rif oriental: Cas du centre de Taouima (Région de Nador, Maroc). 1997. Migration Internationale et Changements Sociaux dans le Maghreb. Actes du Colloque Internationale du Hammamet, Tunisie. 1993; 21-25: 75-97.

23. De Haas H. The Myth of invasion. The inconvenient realities of African migration to Europe. Third World Q. 2020; 29(7): 1305-1322. doi: 10.1080/01436590802386435

24. King R, Skeldon R. “Mind the Gap!” Integrating approaches to internal and international migration. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2010; 36(10): 1619-1646.

25. De Haas H. Migration transitions: A theoretical and empirical inquiry into the developmental drivers of international migration. IMI/DEMIG Working Papers. 2010; 24.

26. Richardson HW. Polarization reversal in developing countries. Pap Reg Sci. 1980; 45(1): 67-85.

27. Geyer Н, Kontuly T. A theoretical foundation for the concept of differential urbanization. Int Reg Sci Rev. 1993; 15(2): 157-177. doi: 10.1177/016001769301500202

28. Bloom DE, Khanna T. The urban revolution. Finance Dev. 2007; 44(3): 9-14.

29. Clark G. Global cities: A short history. Brookings Institution Press; 2016.

30. Matveeva OYu. Global cities are cities that change the socio-cultural space. Vestnik nauki Sibiri. 2015; 1(16): 93-97. (In Russ.).

31. Popov DG, Zhabenko ID. Global cities as a center of global services. Society. Communication. Education. 2018; 9(3): 23-28. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18721/JHSS.9303

32. Friedmann J. The world city hypothesis. Dev Change. 1986; 17(1): 69-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1986.tb00231.x


Review

For citations:


Smakotina N.L. Global social transformations in the context of demographic change and urbanization. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2022;7(3):47-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2022-7.3.6

Views: 989


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)