Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Features of Reproduction of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in a New Cell Line of the Siberian Bat Myotis sibiricus (Kastschenko, 1905)

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2020-5.6.36

Abstract

Background. Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in nature exists due to the constant circulation between vertebrate animals and tick viruses. To study the characteristics of reproduction of TBEV in the cells of vertebrate hosts of various species, it is necessary to simulate infection in the cell lines of both natural and accidental hosts of TBEV.

Aim. To study the possibility of reproduction of TBEV in the cell line of the kidney of Siberian bat Myotis sibiricus (Kastschenko, 1905) – an accidental host of the virus.

Materials and methods. The cell line of Siberian bat M. sibiricus was established by serial passages of primary culture of kidney cells. The SPEV line porcine kidney cells were used as reference. Cells were infected with a strain of TBEV of the Siberian subtype 92M and both cells and cell culture fluids were sampled every 2 hours during first 24 hours post infection. In addition, the samples were collected daily up to 5 days post infection. Evaluation of the amount of intracellular RNA of TBEV of positive polarity (+RNA) was performed  using quantitative real-time PCR. The concentration of infectious TBEV was evaluated using the method of titration TBEV on plaque forming units.

Results. The continuous cell line, designated as MdbK, was established from the kidney cell suspension of M. sibiricus and was used for experiments after 20 serial passages. MdbK cells were able to support the replication of TBEV RNA and production of infectious virus was also possible. The concentration of intracellular RNA had reached 9.1 lg copies/μl by day 3 post infection, whereas highest titer of infectious TBEV in cell culture fluid had comprised 5,5 PFU/ml and was detected by day 4. The concentration of intracellular RNA and the virus infectivity in MdbK cell line was significantly lower than in convenient SPEV line porcine kidney cell.

Conclusions. The results suggest the low fitness of TBEV to the intracellular environment of an accidental host. 

About the Authors

N. A. Liapunovа
Scientific Centre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
Russian Federation

Junior Research Officer at the Laboratory of Arthropod-Borne Infections

Timiryazeva str. 16, Irkutsk 664003, Russian Federation



M. A. Khasnatinov
Scientific Centre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Biol.), Leading Research Officer at the Laboratory of Arthropod Borne Infections

Timiryazeva str. 16, Irkutsk 664003, Russian Federation



G. A. Danchinova
Scientific Centre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Biol.), Head of the Laboratory of Arthropod-Borne Infections

Timiryazeva str. 16, Irkutsk 664003, Russian Federation



References

1. Gritsun TS, Lashkevich VA, Gould EA. Tick-borne encephalitis. Antiviral Res. 2003; 57(1-2): 129-146. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(02)00206-1

2. Lindquist L, Vapalahti O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet. 2008; 371(9627): 1861-1871. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60800-4

3. Süss J. Epidemiology and ecology of TBE relevant to the production of effective vaccines. Vaccine. 2003; 21(Suppl 1): S19-S35. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00812-5

4. Khasnatinov MA, Bolotova NA, Milovidov KS, Danchinova GA, Kondratov IG. Replication of RNA of tick-borne encephalitis virus in new transferable cell lines of the natural host Apodemus peninsulae. Molecular genetics, microbiology and virology. 2018; 33(1): 49-54. doi: 10.3103/S0891416818010068. (in Russ.)

5. Kruskop SV, Borisenko AV, Ivanova NV, Lim BK, Eger JL. Genetic diversity of northeastern palaearctic bats as revealed by DNA barcodes. Acta Chiropterologica. 2012; 14(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3161/150811012X654222

6. Khasnatinov MA, Danchinova GA, Zlobin VI, Lyapunov AV, Arbatskaya YeV, Chaporgina YeA, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in Mongolia. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2012; (4): 9-12. (In Russ.)

7. Gould EA, Clegg JCS. Growth, titration and purification of Togaviruses. In: Mahy BWJ (ed.). Virology: A Practical Approach. IRL Press; 1985: 43-48.

8. Schwaiger M, Cassinotti P. Development of a quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay with internal control for the laboratory detection of tick borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) RNA. J Clin Virol. 2003; 27(2): 136-145. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00168-3

9. Lyapunova NA, Khasnatinov MA, Danchinova GA. Optimization of a quantitative real-time RT-PCR technique for evaluation of concentration of genomic +RNA of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2019; 4(5): 116-121. doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.5.18. (In Russ.)

10. Walpole RE, Myers RH, Myers SL, Ye K. Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2007.


Review

For citations:


Liapunovа N.A., Khasnatinov M.A., Danchinova G.A. Features of Reproduction of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in a New Cell Line of the Siberian Bat Myotis sibiricus (Kastschenko, 1905). Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2020;5(6):271-275. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2020-5.6.36

Views: 765


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)