Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Using an Algorithm to Choose the Surgical Tactics for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection of Large Joints

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2020-5.6.24

Abstract

Background. The known methods of choosing the surgical treatment of infectious complications of arthroplasty of large joints have their drawbacks.

Aim of the study. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for choosing surgical tactics in patients with periprosthetic infection of the hip and knee joints.

Materials and methods. The analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 67 patients with deep periprosthetic infection of the hip and knee joints, who were in the clinic of the Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology from 2014 to 2019. The average age of the patients was 67.8 ± 6.3 years (from 36  to 81 years). 50.7 % were men. In 42 patients, the infectious process developed in the area of the hip joint endoprosthesis, in 25 – in the knee joint. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the method of choosing surgical tactics. The first group consisted of 47 patients in whom the choice of surgical tactics was performed as standard. In 20 patients of the second group, the treatment tactics were determined using the proposed algorithm. The proposed algorithm for choosing surgical tactics for periprosthetic infection includes determining the degree of risk of maintaining the infectious process in the area of the prosthetic joint after the proposed surgical treatment and evaluating additional criteria.

Results. Analysis of the results of the treatment of patients with deep periprosthetic infection of the hip and knee joint showed that in patients of the first group, it was possible to arrest the infectious process in 61.7 % of cases, in the second group of patients, relief of periprosthetic infection was achieved in 90 % of cases.

Conclusion. The use of the proposed algorithm for choosing surgical tactics for periprosthetic infection, taking into account the risk factors for maintaining the infectious process and evaluating additional criteria, makes it possible to determine the type of surgical intervention that is optimal for each patient, and contributes to the relief of the infectious process in the area of the prosthetic joint. 

About the Authors

A. N. Grishchuk
Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Med.), Research Officer at the Clinical Research Department of Traumatology

Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003, Russian Federation





S. N. Leonova
Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Med.), Leading Research Officer at the Clinical Research Department of Traumatology

Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003, Russian Federation



A. L. Kameka
Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Med.), Research Officer at the Clinical Research Department of Traumatology

Bortsov Revolyutsii str. 1, Irkutsk 664003, Russian Federation



References

1. Ezhov IYu, Korytkin AA, Bobrov MI, Zagrekov VI, Shebashev AV. The problem of purulent-necrotic and early purulentseptic complications in hip arthroplasty. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2010; 5(1): 22-25. (In Russ.)

2. Yacovelli S, Parvizi J. Who should manage periprosthetic joint infection? The case for a multidisciplinary approach. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2019; 25(4): 28-32.

3. Shubnyakov II, Bozhkova SA, Artyukh VV, Liventsov VN, Kochish AA, Afanasyev AV. Immediate outcome of a patient with a periprosthetic hip infection. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2017; (4): 52-55. (In Russ.)

4. Kuiper JWP, Rustenburg CME, Willems JH, Verberne SJ, Peters EJG, Saouti R. Results and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip: a single-centre retrospective study. J Bone Jt Infect. 2018; 3(3): 143-149. doi: 10.7150/jbji.24366

5. Lange J, Troelsen A, Solgaard S, Otte KS, Jensen NK, Søballe K, et al. Cementless one-stage revision in chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection. Ninety-one percent infection free survival in 56 patients at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(4): 1160-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.024

6. Pavlov VV, Sadovoy MA, Prokhorenko VM. Modern aspects of diagnostics and surgical treatment of patients with periprosthetic hip joint infection (review of literature). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2015; 1(75): 116-128. (In Russ.)

7. Vinkler T, Trumpush A, Renz N, Perka K, Bozhkova SA. Classification and algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic hip infection. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2016; 1(79): 33-45. (In Russ.)

8. Ermakov AM, Klyushin NM, Ababkov YuV, Tryapichnikov AS, Koyushkov AN. One-stage revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic hip joint infection. Genij Ortopedii. 2019; 25(2): 172-179. (In Russ.)

9. Oshkukov SA. Surgical treatment of periprosthetic infection of the hip and knee joints: dissertation of Cand. Sc. (Med.). Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.)

10. Leonova SN, Grishchuk AN, Kameka AL. Method for determining surgical tactics of revision arthroplasty of large joints in case of infectious complication: Patent of the Russian Federation N 2692960. (In Russ.)

11. Tikhilov RM, Shapovalov VM. Complications after arthroplasty of the hip joint: Paraprosthetic infection. URL: http://bone-surgery.ru/view/oslozhneniya-posle-endoprotezirovaniyatazobedrennogo-sustava-paraproteznay. (In Russ.)

12. Leonova SN, Kameka AL, Grishchuk AN. Algorithm for medical treatment of patients with surgical site infections after arthroplasty of large joints: medical technology. Irkutsk; 2019. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Grishchuk A.N., Leonova S.N., Kameka A.L. Using an Algorithm to Choose the Surgical Tactics for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection of Large Joints. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2020;5(6):199-204. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2020-5.6.24

Views: 545


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)