Preview

Acta Biomedica Scientifica

Advanced search

Surgical Treatment of Andersson’s Lesion in Ankylosing Spondylitis after Corrective Vertebrotomy in the Long Term (Clinical Observation)

https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2020-5.6.19

Abstract

Using a clinical example, the authors set the goal of elucidating the result of a two-stage surgical treatment of Anderson’s lesion, carried out in the long-term period after a one-stage correction of flexion deformity of the  ankylosed spine without fixation.

Results. The analysis of the results of treatment three years after decompression-corrective stabilizing surgery performed for Anderson’s lesion at the ThX–ThXI level, which developed 10 years after the correction of flexion deformity of the ankylosed spine by “open” vertebrotomy LIV–LV. No progression of Anderson’s lesion in all previously identified vertebral segments was noted. The existing neurological deficit regressed from ASIA C to ASIA E. Normalization of the SVA sagittal balance parameter was revealed, with preserved local kyphosis at the ThX–ThXI level of 15° (initial – 30°). The indicator ODI (Oswestry Disability Index), VAS and FIM (Functional Independence Measure) were, respectively, before surgery 67, 6 and 82, 3 years after surgery – 10, 0 and 126.

Conclusion. In the presented case, the surgical correction of the deformity, carried out taking into account the parameters of the sagittal balance, with the stabilization of the ventral and dorsal columns, and decompression, made it possible to prevent the progression of Andersson’s lesion, achieve regression of neurological symptoms, and improve the patient’s quality of life.

About the Authors

V. V. Rerikh
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics named after Ya.L. Tsivyan; Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Scientific Research Department of Spine Pathology; Professor at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Frunze str. 17, Novosibirsk 630091, Russian Federation

Krasniy prospect 52, Novosibirsk 631091, Russian Federation



E. V. Dubinin
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics named after Ya.L. Tsivyan
Russian Federation

Postgraduate, Orthopedic Traumatologist

Frunze str. 17, Novosibirsk 630091, Russian Federation



References

1. Wu M, Yan F, Ping A, Lei J. Effects of Andersson lesion treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: A medical record review study focused on medium- to long-term outcomes. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020; 23(6): 753-762. doi: 10.1111/1756-185x.13826

2. Shaik I, Bhojraj SY, Prasad G, Nagad PB, Patel PM, Kashikar AD, et al. Management of Andersson lesion in ankylosing spondylitis using the posterior-only approach: a case series of 18 patients. Asian Spine J. 2018; 12(6): 1017-1027. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1017

3. Shih TT, Chen PQ, Li YW, Hsu CY. Spinal fractures and pseudoarthrosis complicating ankylosing spondylitis: MRI manifestation and clinical significance. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25(2): 164-170. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200103000-00002

4. Bron JL, de Vries MK, Snieders MN, van der Horst Bruinsma IE, van Royen BJ. Discovertebral (Andersson) lesions of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis revisited. Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 28: 883-892.

5. Rerikh VV, Rakhmatillaev SN. Treatment of pseudoarthrosis of the ankylosed thoracolumbar spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine Surgery. 2004; (3): 84-88. (In Russ.)

6. Chen LH, Kao FC, Niu CC, Lai PL, Fu TS, Chen WJ. Surgical treatment of spinal pseudoarthrosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Chang Gung Med J. 2005; 28: 621-628.

7. Dave BR, Ram H, Krishnan A. Andersson lesion: are we misdiagnosing it? A retrospective study of clinicoradiological features and outcome of short segment fixation. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20: 1503-1509.

8. Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28: 1889-1905. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1

9. Kim SK, Shin K, Song Y, Lee S, Kim TH. Andersson lesions of whole spine magnetic resonance imaging compared with plain radiography in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2016; 36(12): 1663-1670. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3542-z

10. Ling T, Zhou B, Zhu C, Yang X, Song Y, Qiang Z, et al. One-stage posterior grade 4 osteotomy and bone graft fusion at pseudarthrosis for the treatment of kyphotic deformity with Andersson lesions in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017; 159: 19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.05.017

11. Qian BP, Jiang J, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu ZZ. Radiographical predictors for postoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine. 2013; 38(26): E1669- E1675. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000021

12. Liu ZJ, Qian BP, Qiu Y, Mao SH, Jiang J, Wang B. Does relocation of the apex after osteotomy affect surgical and clinical outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and thoracolumbar kyphosis? J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 31(1): 27-34. doi: 10.3171/2018.12.SPINE18752

13. Wang T, Zhao Y, Liang Y, Zhang H, Wang Z, Wang Y. Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior osteotomy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 29(1): 75-80. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17228


Review

For citations:


Rerikh V.V., Dubinin E.V. Surgical Treatment of Andersson’s Lesion in Ankylosing Spondylitis after Corrective Vertebrotomy in the Long Term (Clinical Observation). Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2020;5(6):165-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2020-5.6.19

Views: 737


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-9420 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9596 (Online)