Radiological and Functional Research Methods in the Diagnosis of Segmental Instability in Cervical Osteochondrosis and of Cervicobrachial Syndrome

This paper presents the analysis of diagnostic policy of 72 patients with cervical osteochondrosis and cervicobrachial syndrome. All patients were examined according to a single program, which included a specially designed questionnaire containing address data, diagnosis, history of life and illness, patient complaints, with a mandatory examination by a neurologist for the presence of compression of neural structures of the cervical spine with a detailed description of the local status and clinical and neurological syndromes. Patients underwent general spondylography of the cervical spine in the anteroposterior and lateral projections. For the diagnosis of segmental instability, functional spondylography was performed in the position of maximum flexion and extension and functional spondylography with burdening, which is based on mathematical modeling of the distribution of the vector force load system in the cervical spine under conditions of inclination of the head at an angle of 45° (flexion) and 15° (extension) with the weight on the head weighing up to 500 grams (putting a special device on the head). A mathematical formula for calculating the index of instability of the vertebral motor segment in the cervical spine is proposed. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine was studied with the correlative dependence of its indicators with the intensity of the pain syndrome according to standard spondylography and magnetic resonance imaging. Identified marker indicator of electroneuromyographic studies of the upper extremities - F-wave. Based on the obtained fundamental knowledge, an algorithm for diagnosing osteochondrosis of the cervical spine and cervicobrachial syndrome has been developed and scientifically substantiated.

1. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsal-tis TS, Blondel B, et al. International Spine Study Group (2013): Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(2): 141-159. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE1283

2. Chekhonatskiy AA, Sholomov NI, Filatov DN. Prediction of the course of osteochondrosis of the cervical spine according to the results of a comprehensive assessment of medical and social status and indicators of"quality of life'. Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine XXI veka: Materialy mezhregional'noy nauch.-prakt. konf. k 75-letiyu kafedry luchevoy diagnostiki i luchevoy terapii GOU VPO Saratovskiy GMUim. VI Razumovskogo. Saratov, 2010; 5: 82-85. (In Russ.)

3. Arrtoniou J, Tac SK, Williams GR, Bird S. Suprascapular neuropathy. Variability in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Clin Orthop. 2001; 386: 131-138.

4. Romeo AA, Rotenberg DD, Bach BR. Suprascapular neuropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000; 7(6): 358-367.

5. Levin OG. Diagnosis and treatment of pain in the neck and upper limbs. Russkiymed.zhurnal. 2006; 9: 71-73. (In Russ.)

6. Popelyanskiy Ya.Yu. Orthopedic neurology. Vertebroneurol-ogy. A guide for physicians. 6th Edition. Moscow: MEDpressinform, 2017. (In Russ.)

7. Sorokovikov VA, Koshkareva ZV, Sklyarenko OV. Osteochondrosis: some aspects of the state of the issue. Sibirskiy med-itsinskiyzhurnal (Irkutsk). 2016; 141(2): 22-28. (In Russ.)

8. Bolay H, Moscowitz A. Mechanisms of pain modulation in chronic syndromes. Neurology. 2002; 59(5): 124-144.

9. Akalin E, Cakmur R, Senocak O, Peker O. The droppy shoulder syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001; 121(5): 254-256.

10. Birtane M, Caliech M. The diagnostic value of MRI in subacromial impingement syndrome. Yonsei Med J. 2001; 42(4): 418-424.

11. Sorokovikov VA, Skliarenko OV, Koshkariova ZV. Neurologic syndromes at cervical osteochondrosis. Traumatology, orthopedy and regenerative medicine of the third millennium, materials of II congress of the countries the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. 2016; p. 120-122.