TREATMENT OF EARLY PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION AT HIP REPLACEMENT
Abstract
We carried out the analysis of results of treatment of patients with early periprosthetic infection after total hip replacement with use of tactics aimed at the preservation of an implant and function of the operated joint, based on a multi-stage surgical rehabilitation, clinical and. laboratory monitoring of the wound healing process. The efficiency of chosen tactics in 83 % of cases was shown. Based on these results an algorithm for treatment of early periprosthetic infection at the hip replacement that can be recommended for widespread use in clinical practice was offered.
About the Authors
V. N. Golnik
ФГБУ «Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии» Минздравсоцразвития РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. M. Prokhorenko
ФГБУ «Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии» Минздравсоцразвития РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Pavlov
ФГБУ «Новосибирский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии» Минздравсоцразвития РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ахтямов И.Ф., Кузьмин И.И. Ошибки и осложнения эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава: руководство для врачей. - Казань, 2006. - 328 с.
2. Ключевский В.В. Хирургические методы лечения инфекционных осложнений после эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава: автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. - М., 2007. - 22 с.
3. Прохоренко В.М., Павлов В.В. Инфекционные осложнения при эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. - Новосибирск: Наука, 2010. - 179 с.
4. Сидоренко С.В. Роль бактериальных биопленок в патологии человека // Инфекции в хирургии. - 2004. - Т. 2, № 3. - С. 16 - 20.
5. Donlan R.M., Costerton J.W. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms // Clinical Microbiology Reviews. - 2002. - Vol. 15, N 2. - P. 167 - 193.
6. Estes C.S., Beauchamp C.P., Clarke H.D., Spangehl M.J. A two-stage retention debridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. - 2010. - Vol. 468 (8). - P. 2029 - 2038.
7. Everts R.J., Chambers S.T., Murdoch D.R. et al. Successful antimicrobial therapy and implant retention for streptococcal infection of prosthetic joints // ANZ J. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 74, N 4. - P. 210 - 214.
8. Forsberg J.A., Potter B.K., Cierny G. et al. Diagnosis and management of chronic infection // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. - 2011. - Vol. 19, Suppl. 1. -P. S8-S19.
9. James G.A., Swogger E., Wolcott R. et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds // Wound Repair Regen. -2008. - Vol. 16 (1). - P. 37 - 44.
10. Kienapfel H., Kuhn K.-D. The infected implant. - Springer, 2009, Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg, 2009.
11. Parvizi J., Azzam K., Ghanem E., Valle C.D. et al. Periprosthetic infection: A new prognostic classification // 27th Annual Meeting of the EBJIS. -Barcelona, 2008.
12. Pignatti G., Nitta S., Rani N. et al. Two stage revision in periprosthetic infection: results of 41 cases // Open Orthop. J. - 2010. - Vol. 4. - P. 193 - 200.
13. Schmalzried T.P., Amstutz H.C., Au M.K. Dorey F.J. Etiology of deep sepsis in total hip arthroplasty. The significance of hematogenous and recurrent infections // Clin. Orthop. - 1992. - Vol. 280. -P. 200 - 207.
Review
For citations:
Golnik V.N., Prokhorenko V.M., Pavlov V.V. TREATMENT OF EARLY PERIPROSTHETIC INFECTION AT HIP REPLACEMENT. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2012;(4(2)):35-38. (In Russ.)
Views:
546
.png)
Email this article 
